Influences on what consumers know and what they think they know regarding marketer pricing tactics

被引:38
作者
Carlson, Jay P. [1 ]
Bearden, William O.
Hardesty, David M.
机构
[1] Union Univ, Union Grad Coll, Sch Management, Schenectady, NY 12308 USA
[2] Univ S Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/mar.20155
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although a considerable amount of research has investigated consumer knowledge of individual prices, consumer knowledge of marketer pricing tactics (e.g., partitioned prices, pennies a day) has received only limited attention. In the current research, a model depicting hypothesized antecedents of consumer knowledge (both accurate and self-perceived) regarding pricing tactics marketers use is proposed and then investigated in two studies. Tests of the model provided support for the hypothesized antecedents of both objective and subjective pricing tactic knowledge and suggested that experience is a key moderator of the objective pricing tactic knowledge-subjective pricing tactic knowledge relationship. (c) 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 142
页数:26
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Knowledge calibration: What consumers know and what they think they know [J].
Alba, JW ;
Hutchinson, JW .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2000, 27 (02) :123-156
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1977, COMPUTATIONAL HDB ST
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, PRICING MAKING PROFI
[5]   THE NEED FOR COGNITION [J].
CACIOPPO, JT ;
PETTY, RE .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 42 (01) :116-131
[6]   When a day means more than a year: Effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk [J].
Chandran, S ;
Menon, G .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2004, 31 (02) :375-389
[7]  
COLE CA, 1986, ADV CONSUM RES, V13, P64
[8]  
Cordell VV, 1997, PSYCHOL MARKET, V14, P241, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199705)14:3<241::AID-MAR3>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-B
[10]   Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development [J].
Diamantopoulos, A ;
Winklhofer, HM .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2001, 38 (02) :269-277