Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data

被引:73
作者
Woods, Brent J.
Clymer, Bradley D.
Kurc, Tahsin
Heverhagen, Johannes T.
Stevens, Robert
Orsdemir, Adem
Bulan, Orhan
Knopp, Michael V.
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Radiol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Bilkent Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, TR-06533 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
texture analysis; DCE-MRI; neural network; breast; cancer;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.20837
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the use of four-dimensional (4D) co-occurrence-based texture analysis to distinguish between nonmalignant and malignant tissues in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR images. Materials and Methods: 4D texture analysis was performedon DCE-MRI data sets of breast lesions. A model-free neural network-based classification system assigned each voxel a "nonmalignant" or "malignant" label based on the textural features. The classification results were compared via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with the manual lesion segmentation produced by two radiologists (observers 1 and 2). Results: The mean sensitivity and specificity of the classifier agreed with the mean observer 2 performance when compared with segmentations by observer 1 for a 95% confidence interval, using a two-sided t-test with α = 0.05. The results show that an area under the ROC curve (Az) of 0.99948, 0.99867, and 0.99957 can be achieved by comparing the classifier vs. observer 1, classifier vs. union of both observers, and classifier vs. intersection of both observers, respectively. Conclusion: This study shows that a neural network classifier based on 4D texture analysis inputs can achieve a performance comparable to that achieved by human observers, and that further research in this area is warranted. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 501
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS IN CNS GD-DTPA ENHANCED MR IMAGING [J].
BRIX, G ;
SEMMLER, W ;
PORT, R ;
SCHAD, LR ;
LAYER, G ;
LORENZ, WJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1991, 15 (04) :621-628
[2]   Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of tumor perfusion [J].
Collins, DJ ;
Padhani, AR .
IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY MAGAZINE, 2004, 23 (05) :65-83
[3]   A THEORETICAL COMPARISON OF TEXTURE ALGORITHMS [J].
CONNERS, RW ;
HARLOW, CA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1980, 2 (03) :204-222
[4]  
FEIG SA, 1992, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V30, P67
[5]   Textural analysis of contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast [J].
Gibbs, P ;
Turnbull, LW .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2003, 50 (01) :92-98
[6]   TEXTURAL FEATURES FOR IMAGE CLASSIFICATION [J].
HARALICK, RM ;
SHANMUGAM, K ;
DINSTEIN, I .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1973, SMC3 (06) :610-621
[7]  
Kawashima H, 2000, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V11, P233, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(200003)11:3<233::AID-JMRI1>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-X
[9]   Noise and motion correction in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for analysis of atherosclerotic lesions [J].
Kerwin, WS ;
Cai, J ;
Yuan, C .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2002, 47 (06) :1211-1217
[10]   Dynamic breast MR imaging: Are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? [J].
Kuhl, CK ;
Mielcareck, P ;
Klaschik, S ;
Leutner, C ;
Wardelmann, E ;
Gieseke, J ;
Schild, HH .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 211 (01) :101-110