Post Qualitative Inquiry, the Refusal of Method, and the Risk of the New

被引:160
作者
St Pierre, Elizabeth Adams [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Crit Studies Educ Theory & Practice Dept, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Interdisciplinary Qualitat Res Program, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Inst Womens Studies, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
post qualitative inquiry; poststructuralism; postmodernism; posthumanism; philosophy; DELEUZE;
D O I
10.1177/1077800419863005
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This article is a slight revision of a keynote lecture presented at the 15th International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry in Illinois in 2019. It argues that to experiment and create the "new" in post qualitative, post humanist, and other "new" forms of inquiry invented for the 21st century, social science researchers may well need to refuse conventional humanist social science research methodologies created for the problems of previous centuries.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 9
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, QUALITATIVE STUDIES
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, THESIS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CULTURAL STUDIES CRI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, The passion of Michel Foucault
[5]  
[Anonymous], HDB QUALITATIVE RES
[6]   GOFQI and the Phoenix of Qualitative Inquiry [J].
Brinkmann, Svend .
QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, 2015, 21 (07) :620-622
[7]  
Deleuze G., 2015, WHAT IS PHILOS
[8]  
Deleuze G., 1983, NIETZSCHE PHILOS
[9]  
Deleuze Gilles., 2004, DIFFERENCE REPETITIO
[10]  
Derrida J., 1970, LANGUAGES CRITICISM