How do we talk to each other? Writing qualitative research for quantitative readers

被引:33
作者
Belgrave, LL
Zablotsky, D
Guadagno, MA
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Dept Sociol, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Sociol, Charlotte, NC USA
[3] Inst Aging, NIH, Ctr Sci Review, Bethesda, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/1049732302238753
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 [公共卫生与预防医学]; 120402 [社会医学与卫生事业管理];
摘要
The growth of qualitative research holds the potential for vastly enriching our understanding of phenomena in the health sciences. However, the potential of this trend is hampered by a widespread inability of quantitative and qualitative researchers to talk to each other. The authors' concern in this area grows out of our experience reviewing small grant applications for the National Institute on Aging, where they frequently find qualitative research proposals scoring worse than do those using quantitative approaches. This article addresses practical problems in communicating qualitative research to readers whose training and experience is primarily quantitative. Two themes running through the discussion are the need for detail and the explicit tying of methodological strategies to research goals.
引用
收藏
页码:1427 / 1439
页数:13
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Adler Patricia., 1987, MEMBERSHIP ROLES FIE
[2]
Belgrave L., 1995, Qualitative Inquiry, V1, P69, DOI DOI 10.1177/107780049500100105
[3]
Bochner A.P., 2000, QUAL INQ, V6, P266, DOI DOI 10.1177/107780040000600209
[4]
Charmaz K., 2000, HDB QUALITATIVE RES, P509, DOI DOI 10.1177/0891241609342193
[5]
Denzin N.K., 2005, HDB QUALITATIVE RES
[6]
Denzin N.K., 1994, Handbook of qualitative research Thousand Oaks
[7]
Glaser B.G., 1967, DISCOV GROUNDED THEO
[8]
Knapp NF., 1997, Qualitative Inquiry, V3, P326, DOI DOI 10.1177/107780049700300305
[9]
Lincoln Y.S., 2000, HDB QUALITATIVE RES, V2nd
[10]
Lofland J., 1995, ANAL SOCIAL SETTINGS, V3rd