Comparative immunohistochemical profile of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and metastatic adenocarcinoma

被引:189
作者
Lau, SK [1 ]
Prakash, S [1 ]
Geller, SA [1 ]
Alsabeh, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
关键词
hepatocellular carcinoma; cholangiocarcinoma; metastatic adenocarcinoma;
D O I
10.1053/hupa.2002.130104
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Distinguishing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from cholangiocarcinoma (CC) and metastatic adenocarcinoma (MA) involving the liver can be problematic, often requiring the use of immunohistochemistry to facilitate diagnosis. Hep Par 1, a monoclonal antibody with expression confined primarily to benign and malignant hepatocytes, has recently become commercially available. We evaluated Hep Par 1 along with other immunohistochemical markers used to differentiate HCC, CC, and MA, including AE1/AE3, CAM 5.2, B72.3, monoclonal carcinoembryonic antigen (mCEA), polyclonal CEA (pCEA), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), factor XIIIa, inhibin, CD 10, villin, MOC-31, cytokeratin (CK) 7, CK 19, and CK 20, to determine the markers most useful in differentiating these entities. Forty-two cases of HCC, 9 cases of CC, and 56 cases of MA (24 colon, 15 pancreas, 8 ovary, 5 breast, and 4 stomach) were studied. Hep Par 1 was sensitive and specific for HCC, with 38 of 42 (90%) cases staining positively, whereas reactivity was observed in only 8 of 56 (14%) MAs and 0 of 9 CCs. Though limited somewhat by poor sensitivity, a bile canalicular pattern of staining with pCEA, CD10, and villin was specific for HCC and was not observed in the other tumors. Lack of mCEA and MOC-31 immunoreactivity was also characteristic of HCCs. CK 19 positivity favored CC over HCC, but was not useful in differentiating CC from MA. Expression of AFP, although observed in only about one third of the cases, favored HCC over CC and MA. CK 7 and CK 20 were also useful in this differential diagnosis, particularly when dealing with MA of colonic origin. AE1/AE3, CAM 5.2, B72.3, inhibin, and factor XIIIa were noncontributory in differentiating these entities.
引用
收藏
页码:1175 / 1181
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
AKASOFU M, 1993, ACTA PATHOL JAPON, V43, P736
[2]  
BACCHI CE, 1991, LAB INVEST, V64, P418
[3]   DISTINCTION BETWEEN HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA, CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA, AND METASTATIC CARCINOMA BASED ON IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STAINING FOR CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN AND FOR CYTOKERATIN-19 ON PARAFFIN SECTIONS [J].
BALATON, AJ ;
NEHAMASIBONY, M ;
GOTHEIL, C ;
CALLARD, P ;
BAVIERA, EE .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1988, 156 (04) :305-310
[4]   Canalicular immunostaining of neprilysin (CD10) as a diagnostic marker for hepatocellular carcinomas [J].
Borscheri, N ;
Roessner, A ;
Röcken, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2001, 25 (10) :1297-1303
[5]   THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ALPHA-FETOPROTEIN AND OTHER TUMOR-MARKERS IN DIFFERENTIAL IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY OF PRIMARY LIVER-TUMORS [J].
BRUMM, C ;
SCHULZE, C ;
CHARELS, K ;
MOROHOSHI, T ;
KLOPPEL, G .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 1989, 14 (05) :503-513
[6]  
CHRISTENSEN WN, 1989, MODERN PATHOL, V2, P8
[7]   Paraffin-section detection of CD10 in 505 nonhematopoietic neoplasms - Frequent expression in renal cell carcinoma and endometrial stromal sarcoma [J].
Chu, PG ;
Arber, DA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2000, 113 (03) :374-382
[8]   Histogenesis of primary liver carcinomas: Strengths and weaknesses of cytokeratin profile and albumin mRNA detection [J].
DErrico, A ;
Baccarini, P ;
Fiorentino, M ;
Ceccarelli, C ;
Bonazzi, C ;
Ponzetto, A ;
Scoazec, JY ;
Mancini, AM ;
Grigioni, WF .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1996, 27 (06) :599-604
[9]  
EDMONDSON HA, 1954, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V7, P462, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(195405)7:3<462::AID-CNCR2820070308>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-E