Tick-borne encephalitis virus transmission between ticks cofeeding on specific immune natural rodent hosts

被引:186
作者
Labuda, M
Kozuch, O
Zuffova, E
Eleckova, E
Hails, RS
Nuttall, PA
机构
[1] NERC, INST VIROL & ENVIRONM MICROBIOL, OXFORD OX1 3SR, ENGLAND
[2] SLOVAK ACAD SCI, INST ZOOL, BRATISLAVA 84206, SLOVAKIA
[3] SLOVAK ACAD SCI, INST VIROL, BRATISLAVA 84246, SLOVAKIA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/viro.1997.8622
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
To determine whether the portion of a vertebrate host population having specific immunity to tick-borne encephalitis (TEE) virus can participate in the TEE virus transmission cycle, natural hosts immunized against TEE virus were challenged with infected and uninfected ticks. Yellow-necked field mice (Apodemus flavicollis) and bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) were either immunized with TEE virus by subcutaneous inoculation of the virus, or they were exposed to virus-infected Ixodes ricinus ticks. One month later, when serum neutralizing antibody was detectable, the animals were infested with infected (donor) adult female ticks and uninfected (recipient) nymphal ticks; recipients were allowed to feed either in close contact (chamber 1) or physically separated (chamber 2) from the infected donor ticks. Following challenge with infected (and uninfected) ticks, viremia developed in all the control, nonimmune animals, whereas viremia was undetectable in all those animals naturally immunized by previous exposure to infected ticks. Despite the presence of neutralizing antibodies in all the immunized animals, 89% (24/27) immune animals supported virus transmission between infected and uninfected cofeeding ticks. Most transmission was localized, occurring within chamber 1; disseminated transmission from chamber 1 to chamber 2 was reduced. Immunization by tick bite was more Effective than immunization by syringe inoculation in blocking cofeeding virus transmission Nevertheless 75% (9/12) animals with ''natural'' immunity still supported transmission. The results demonstrate that natural hosts having neutralizing antibodies to TEE virus (and no detectable viremia) can still support virus transmission between infected and uninfected ticks feeding closely together on the same animal. These observations have important epidemiological implications relating to the survival of TEE virus in Nature. (C) 1997 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 143
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
ALEXANDER R. A., 1935, ONDERSTEPOORT JOUR VET SCI AND ANIMAL INDUST UNION SO AFRICA DEPT AGRIC, V5, P15
[2]  
ANDERSON R M, 1991
[3]  
DEMADRID AT, 1969, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V40, P113
[4]   CLETHRIONOMYS-GLAREOLUS, BUT NOT APODEMUS-FLAVICOLLIS, ACQUIRES RESISTANCE TO IXODES-RICINUS L, THE MAIN EUROPEAN VECTOR OF BORRELIA-BURGDORFERI [J].
DIZIJ, A ;
KURTENBACH, K .
PARASITE IMMUNOLOGY, 1995, 17 (04) :177-183
[5]  
DUMINA A. L., 1958, VOPROSY VIRUSOL [TRANSL], V3, P166
[6]   THE EFFECT OF VIRUS-IMMUNE HOSTS ON THOGOTO VIRUS-INFECTION OF THE TICK, RHIPICEPHALUS-APPENDICULATUS [J].
JONES, LD ;
NUTTALL, PA .
VIRUS RESEARCH, 1989, 14 (02) :129-140
[7]   A NOVEL MODE OF ARBOVIRUS TRANSMISSION INVOLVING A NONVIREMIC HOST [J].
JONES, LD ;
DAVIES, CR ;
STEELE, GM ;
NUTTALL, PA .
SCIENCE, 1987, 237 (4816) :775-777
[8]  
KORENBERG EI, 1974, FOLIA PARASIT, V23, P357
[9]  
KOZUCH O, 1990, ACTA VIROL, V34, P537
[10]  
KUBES M, 1994, IMMUNOLOGY, V82, P113