Analysis and reporting of platelet kinetic studies

被引:11
作者
Dumont, Larry J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Gambro BCT Inc, Lakewood, CO USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.01021.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
BACKGROUND: For platelet (PLT) kinetic studies in the healthy subject, autologous transfusion models are standardly used for the evaluation of new or modified PLT collection or treatment methods. The investigator is usually seeking to demonstrate that the new product is not inferior to a control condition. Consistent, statistically sound analysis and reporting methods will enable clear interpretation and communication of the results. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Noninferiority hypotheses are constructed in light of a recent FDA workshop. One- and two-stage analysis methods are described to evaluate the paired differences in control and test arms with calculation of upper confidence intervals. Sample size estimates are presented for various experimental design options. The sensitivity of sample size to the difference in test and control recoveries is performed. RESULTS: The noninferiority hypothesis test was applied to a recently published study. Seven-day, plasma-stored apheresis PLTs were shown to be noninferior to freshly prepared PLTs with 95 percent confidence that the difference in recovery was not more than 11.4 percent and survival not more than 2.6 days, with maximum acceptable differences of 19.8 percent and 4.4 days. As the test recovery and survival approach the minimum acceptable value, the sample size required to demonstrate noninferiority increases nonlinearly. Preliminary sample size calculations presented here suggest that for most studies such as this, a minimum sample size of 7 should be anticipated. Because most of these studies are used to support regulatory submissions, this is usually executed in at least two centers for a total minimum of 14. CONCLUSION: The randomized, paired design is the most efficient approach to these studies. Consistent reporting of summary statistics for each test arm and the paired differences, the upper confidence limit for the differences in recovery and survival, and the maximum acceptable difference for each is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:67S / 73S
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]
Further evaluation of a new standard of efficacy for stored platelets [J].
AuBuchon, JP ;
Herschel, L ;
Roger, J .
TRANSFUSION, 2005, 45 (07) :1143-1150
[2]
Platelet radiolabeling procedure [J].
AuBuchon J.P. .
TRANSFUSION, 2006, 46 (03) :59S-66S
[3]
The quality of platelets after storage for 7 days [J].
Cardigan, R ;
Williamson, LM .
TRANSFUSION MEDICINE, 2003, 13 (04) :173-187
[4]
Seven-day storage of single-donor platelets: recovery and survival in an autologous transfusion study [J].
Dumont, LJ ;
AuBuchon, JP ;
Whitley, P ;
Herschel, LH ;
Johnson, A ;
McNeil, D ;
Sawyer, S ;
Roger, JC .
TRANSFUSION, 2002, 42 (07) :847-854
[5]
FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, 2004, WORKSH US RAD PLAT A
[6]
CONCURRENT LABEL METHOD WITH IN-111 AND CR-51 ALLOWS ACCURATE EVALUATION OF PLATELET VIABILITY OF STORED PLATELET CONCENTRATES [J].
HOLME, S ;
HEATON, A ;
ROODT, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1993, 84 (04) :717-723
[7]
Littell RC., 1996, SAS SYSTEM MIXED MOD
[8]
A COMPUTER-PROGRAM IN COMPILED BASIC FOR THE IBM PERSONAL-COMPUTER TO CALCULATE THE MEAN PLATELET SURVIVAL-TIME WITH THE MULTIPLE-HIT AND WEIGHTED MEAN METHODS [J].
LOTTER, MG ;
RABE, WL ;
VANZYL, JM ;
HEYNS, AD ;
WESSELS, P ;
KOTZE, HF ;
MINNAAR, PC .
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1988, 18 (04) :305-315
[9]
ESTIMATION OF BLOOD PLATELET SURVIVAL .2. MULTIPLE HIT MODEL [J].
MURPHY, EA ;
FRANCIS, ME .
THROMBOSIS ET DIATHESIS HAEMORRHAGICA, 1971, 25 (01) :53-+
[10]
The case for a new approach for documenting platelet viability [J].
Murphy, Scott .
TRANSFUSION, 2006, 46 (03) :49S-52S