Using total error as decision criterion in analytical method transfer

被引:33
作者
Dewe, W.
Govaerts, B.
Boulanger, B.
Rozet, E.
Chiap, P.
Hubert, Ph.
机构
[1] Eli Lilly & Co, Lilly Dev Ctr, B-1348 Mont St Guibert, Belgium
[2] Univ Catholique Louvain, Inst Stat, B-1348 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Univ Liege, Dept Pharm, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
关键词
analytical method; transfer; accuracy; total error; tolerance interval; consumer risk; producer risk;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemolab.2006.07.003
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
An analytical transfer is a complete process that consists in transferring a validated analytical method from a sending laboratory (called sender) to a receiving laboratory (called receiver) after having experimentally demonstrated that it also masters the method. The decision to transfer an analytical method is usually taken based on the combination of two criteria: one about systematic error and one about random errors. These usual criteria, their combination and their limitations are described in this paper. As it is for method validation, total error-based approaches should be also considered in method transfer. Two approaches are proposed in order to have a total error-based criterion and to take into account the precision of the true value estimate. In the first approach, a beta-expectation tolerance interval similar to the one used in method validation is calculated and then compared to acceptance limits around the estimate of the true value. The second approach, found as slightly more powerful than the first one, consists in estimating the probability to have a result outside these acceptance limits. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 268
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, 5725 ISO
[2]   An analysis of the SFSTP guide on validation of chromatographic bioanalytical methods: progresses and limitations [J].
Boulanger, B ;
Chiap, P ;
Dewe, W ;
Crommen, J ;
Hubert, P .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 2003, 32 (4-5) :753-765
[3]   REAPPRAISAL OF HYPOTHESIS-TESTING FOR METHOD VALIDATION - DETECTION OF SYSTEMATIC-ERROR BY COMPARING THE MEANS OF 2 METHODS OR OF 2 LABORATORIES [J].
HARTMANN, C ;
SMEYERSVERBEKE, J ;
PENNINCKX, W ;
VANDERHEYDEN, Y ;
VANKEERBERGHEN, P ;
MASSART, DL .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1995, 67 (24) :4491-4499
[4]   Two-sided tolerance intervals for balanced and unbalanced random effects models [J].
Hoffman, D ;
Kringle, R .
JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2005, 15 (02) :283-293
[5]   Harmonization of strategies for the validation of quantitative analytical procedures -: A SFSTP proposal -: part I [J].
Hubert, P ;
Nguyen-Huu, JJ ;
Boulanger, B ;
Chapuzet, E ;
Chiap, P ;
Cohen, N ;
Compagnon, PA ;
Dewé, W ;
Feinberg, M ;
Lallier, M ;
Laurentie, M ;
Mercier, N ;
Muzard, G ;
Nivet, C ;
Valat, L .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 2004, 36 (03) :579-586
[6]  
*ISPE, 2003, GOOD PRACT GUID TECH
[7]  
JOHNSON Y, 2004, FDA PERSPECTIVE METH
[8]   A unified approach for design and analysis of transfer studies for analytical methods [J].
Kringle, R ;
Khan-Malek, R ;
Snikeris, F .
DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2001, 35 (04) :1271-1288