An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction

被引:497
作者
Ajami, Newsha K.
Duan, Qingyun
Sorooshian, Soroosh
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Berkeley Water Ctr, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Livermore, CA 94551 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ctr Hydrometeorol & Remote Sensing, Irvine, CA 92679 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2005WR004745
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 [工学]; 0830 [环境科学与工程];
摘要
The conventional treatment of uncertainty in rainfall-runoff modeling primarily attributes uncertainty in the input-output representation of the model to uncertainty in the model parameters without explicitly addressing the input, output, and model structural uncertainties. This paper presents a new framework, the Integrated Bayesian Uncertainty Estimator (IBUNE), to account for the major uncertainties of hydrologic rainfall-runoff predictions explicitly. IBUNE distinguishes between the various sources of uncertainty including parameter, input, and model structural uncertainty. An input error model in the form of a Gaussian multiplier has been introduced within IBUNE. These multipliers are assumed to be drawn from an identical distribution with an unknown mean and variance which were estimated along with other hydrological model parameters by a Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) scheme. IBUNE also includes the Bayesian model averaging (BMA) scheme which is employed to further improve the prediction skill and address model structural uncertainty using multiple model outputs. A series of case studies using three rainfall-runoff models to predict the streamflow in the Leaf River basin, Mississippi, are used to examine the necessity and usefulness of this technique. The results suggest that ignoring either input forcings error or model structural uncertainty will lead to unrealistic model simulations and incorrect uncertainty bounds.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]
Multi-model data fusion for river flow forecasting: an evaluation of six alternative methods based on two contrasting catchments [J].
Abrahart, RJ ;
See, L .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2002, 6 (04) :655-670
[2]
Multimodel combination techniques for analysis of hydrological simulations: Application to Distributed Model Intercomparison Project results [J].
Ajami, Newsha K. ;
Duan, Qingyun ;
Gao, Xiaogang ;
Sorooshian, Soroosh .
JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2006, 7 (04) :755-768
[3]
AJAMI NK, 2005, A MET SOC M SAN DIEG
[4]
[Anonymous], 2003, CALIBRATION WATERSHE
[5]
WATER-QUALITY MODELING - A REVIEW OF THE ANALYSIS OF UNCERTAINTY [J].
BECK, MB .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1987, 23 (08) :1393-1442
[6]
THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION [J].
BEVEN, K ;
BINLEY, A .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) :279-298
[7]
Box GE., 2011, BAYESIAN INFERENCE S
[8]
Boyle D, 2001, THESIS U ARIZ TUCSON
[9]
BRAZIL LE, 1988, THESIS COLO STATE U
[10]
Burnash R. J. C., 1973, GEN STREAMFLOW SIMUL