An efficient method for screening faecal DNA genotypes and detecting new individuals and hybrids in the red wolf (Canis rufus) experimental population area

被引:60
作者
Adams, Jennifer R. [1 ]
Waits, Lisette P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Idaho, Dept Fish & Wildlife, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
关键词
Canis rufus; faecal DNA; genotyping errors; hybrid detection;
D O I
10.1007/s10592-006-9154-5
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Previously, sequencing of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) from non-invasively collected faecal material (scat) has been used to help manage hybridization in the wild red wolf (Canis rufus) population. This method is limited by the maternal inheritance of mtDNA and the inability to obtain individual identification. Here, we optimize the use of nuclear DNA microsatellite markers on red wolf scat DNA to distinguish between individuals and detect hybrids. We develop a data filtering method in which scat genotypes are compared to known blood genotypes to reduce the number of PCR amplifications needed. We apply our data filtering method and the more conservative maximum likelihood ratio method (MLR) of Miller et al. (2002 Genetics 160:357-366) to a scat dataset previously screened for hybrids by sequencing of mtDNA. Using seven microsatellite loci, we obtained genotypes for 105 scats, which were matched to 17 individuals. The PCR amplification success rate was 50% and genotyping error rates ranged from 6.6% to 52.1% per locus. Our data filtering method produced comparable results to the MLR method, and decreased the time and cost of analysis by 25%. Analysis of this dataset using our data filtering method verified that no hybrid individuals were present in the Alligator River National Wildlife Refuge, North Carolina in 2000. Our results demonstrate that nuclear DNA microsatellite analysis of red wolf scats provides an efficient and accurate approach to screen for new individuals and hybrids.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 131
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Using faecal DNA sampling and GIS to monitor hybridization between red wolves (Canis rufus) and coyotes (Canis latrans) [J].
Adams, JR ;
Kelly, BT ;
Waits, LP .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2003, 12 (08) :2175-2186
[2]   Wombat coprogenetics: enumerating a common wombat population by microsatellite analysis of faecal DNA [J].
Banks, SC ;
Piggott, MP ;
Hansen, BD ;
Robinson, NA ;
Taylor, AC .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2002, 50 (02) :193-204
[3]   Estimating population size of elusive animals with DNA from hunter-collected feces: Four methods for brown bears [J].
Bellemain, E ;
Swenson, JE ;
Tallmon, O ;
Brunberg, S ;
Taberlet, P .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (01) :150-161
[4]   Improved noninvasive genotyping method:: application to brown bear (Ursus arctos) faeces [J].
Bellemain, E ;
Taberlet, P .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY NOTES, 2004, 4 (03) :519-522
[5]   Quantifying genotyping errors in noninvasive population genetics [J].
Broquet, T ;
Petit, E .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2004, 13 (11) :3601-3608
[6]   Noninvasive paternity assignment in Gombe chimpanzees [J].
Constable, JL ;
Ashley, MV ;
Goodall, J ;
Pusey, AE .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2001, 10 (05) :1279-1300
[7]   Population size estimation in Yellowstone wolves with error-prone noninvasive microsatellite genotypes [J].
Creel, S ;
Spong, G ;
Sands, JL ;
Rotella, J ;
Zeigle, J ;
Joe, L ;
Murphy, KM ;
Smith, D .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2003, 12 (07) :2003-2009
[8]   Identifying species from pieces of faeces [J].
Dalén, L ;
Götherström, A ;
Angerbjörn, A .
CONSERVATION GENETICS, 2004, 5 (01) :109-111
[9]   On the origin of faeces:: morphological versus molecular methods for surveying rare carnivores from their scats [J].
Davison, A ;
Birks, JDS ;
Brookes, RC ;
Braithwaite, TC ;
Messenger, JE .
JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2002, 257 :141-143
[10]  
DEBARBA M, 2005, MONITORING BROWN BEA