Discrete and continuum modelling of excavator bucket filling

被引:43
作者
Coetzee, C. J.
Basson, A. H.
Vermeer, P. A.
机构
[1] Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Mech Engn, ZA-7601 Matieland, South Africa
[2] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Geotech, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
discrete element method; material-point method; Cosserat continuum; bucket filling; digging process; excavation; IN-CELL METHOD; PARTICLE; FLIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.jterra.2006.07.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
083001 [环境科学];
摘要
Two-dimensional discrete and continuum modelling of excavator bucket filling is presented. The discrete element method (DEM) is used for the discrete modelling and the material-point method (MPM) for continuum modelling. MPM is a so-called particle method or meshless finite element method. Standard finite element methods have difficulty in modelling the entire bucket filling process due to large displacements and distortions of the mesh. The use of a meshless method overcomes this problem. DEM and MPM simulations (plane strain) of bucket filling are compared to two-dimensional experimental results. Cohesionless corn grains were used as material and the simulated force acting on the bucket and flow patterns were compared with experimental results. The corn macro (continuum) and micro (DEM) properties were obtained from shear and oedometer tests. As part of the MPNI simulations, both the classic (nonpolar) and the Cosserat (polar) continuums were used. Results show that the nonpolar continuum is the most accurate in predicting the bucket force while the polar and DEM methods predict lower forces. The DEM model does not accurately predict the material flow during filling, while the polar and nonpolar methods are more accurate. Different flow zones develop during filling and it is shown that DEM, the polar and the nonpolar methods can accurately predict the position and orientation of these different flow zones. (c) 2006 ISTVS. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 186
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
The material-point method for granular materials [J].
Bardenhagen, SG ;
Brackbill, JU ;
Sulsky, D .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2000, 187 (3-4) :529-541
[2]
COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN LAGRANGIAN AND EULERIAN HYDROCODES [J].
BENSON, DJ .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 1992, 99 (2-3) :235-394
[3]
FLIP - A LOW-DISSIPATION, PARTICLE-IN-CELL METHOD FOR FLUID-FLOW [J].
BRACKBILL, JU ;
KOTHE, DB ;
RUPPEL, HM .
COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 1988, 48 (01) :25-38
[4]
MASS MATRIX FORMULATION OF THE FLIP PARTICLE-IN-CELL METHOD [J].
BURGESS, D ;
SULSKY, D ;
BRACKBILL, JU .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1992, 103 (01) :1-15
[5]
An evaluation of the MPM for simulating dynamic failure with damage diffusion [J].
Chen, Z ;
Hu, W ;
Shen, L ;
Xin, X ;
Brannon, R .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2002, 69 (17) :1873-1890
[6]
Cleary PW, 1998, MATH ENG IND, V7, P1
[7]
Coetzee CJ, 2004, The modelling of granular flow using the particle-in-cell method
[8]
COETZEE CJ, 2000, THESIS U STELLENBOSC
[9]
DISCRETE NUMERICAL-MODEL FOR GRANULAR ASSEMBLIES [J].
CUNDALL, PA ;
STRACK, ODL .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 1979, 29 (01) :47-65
[10]
De Borst R., 1991, Engineering Computations, V8, P317, DOI 10.1108/eb023842