Temporal discounting predicts risk sensitivity in rhesus Macaques

被引:95
作者
Hayden, Benjamin Y. [1 ]
Platt, Michael L.
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurobiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Neuroecon Studies, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Biol Anthropol & Anat, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Ctr Cognit Neurosci, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
CHOICE; PROBABILITY; VARIANCE; BEHAVIOR; REWARDS; NEURONS; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.055
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Humans and animals tend both to avoid uncertainty and to prefer immediate over future rewards. The comorbidity of psychiatric disorders such as impulsivity, problem gambling, and addiction suggests that a common mechanism may underlie risk sensitivity and temporal discounting [1-6]. Nonetheless, the precise relationship between these two traits remains largely unknown [3, 5]. To examine whether risk sensitivity. and temporal discounting reflect a common process, we recorded choices made by two rhesus macaques in a visual gambling task [7] while we varied the delay between trials. We found that preference for the risky option declined with increasing delay between sequential choices in the task, even when all other task parameters were held constant. These results were quantitatively predicted by a model that assumed that the subjective expected utility of the risky option is evaluated based on the expected time of the larger payoff [5, 6]. The importance of the larger payoff in this model suggests that the salience of larger payoffs played a critical role in determining the value of risky options. These data suggest that risk sensitivity may be a product of other cognitive processes, and specifically that myopia for the future and the salience of jackpots control the propensity to take a gamble.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 53
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes [J].
Bickel, WK ;
Marsch, LA .
ADDICTION, 2001, 96 (01) :73-86
[2]   OPTIMAL FORAGING, MARGINAL VALUE THEOREM [J].
CHARNOV, EL .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 1976, 9 (02) :129-136
[3]   Time discounting and time preference: A critical review [J].
Frederick, S ;
Loewenstein, G ;
O'Donoghue, T .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2002, 40 (02) :351-401
[4]   Neuroeconomics: The consilience of brain and decision [J].
Glimcher, PW ;
Rustichini, A .
SCIENCE, 2004, 306 (5695) :447-452
[5]  
Green L, 1996, AM ZOOL, V36, P496
[6]   A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards [J].
Green, L ;
Myerson, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2004, 130 (05) :769-792
[7]   Risk aversion and incentive effects [J].
Holt, CA ;
Laury, SK .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 92 (05) :1644-1655
[8]   Risky choice and Weber's law [J].
Kacelnik, A ;
Abreu, FBE .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1998, 194 (02) :289-298
[9]  
Kacelnik A, 1996, AM ZOOL, V36, P402
[10]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291