Benchmarking Outcomes in Plastic Surgery: National Complication Rates for Abdominoplasty and Breast Augmentation

被引:127
作者
Alderman, Amy K. [1 ]
Collins, E. Dale
Streu, Rachel
Grotting, James C.
Sulkin, Amy L.
Neligan, Peter
Haeck, Phillip C.
Gutowski, Karol A.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sect Plast Surg, Dept Surg, Med Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; AESTHETIC SURGERY; OUTPATIENT; ECONOMICS; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bf8378
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
100210 [外科学];
摘要
Background: The authors evaluated the use of national databases to track surgical complications among abdominoplasty and breast augmentation patients. Methods: Their study population included all patients with abdominoplasty or breast augmentation in the Tracking Operations and Outcomes for Plastic Surgeons (TOPS) and CosmetAssure databases from 2003 to 2007. They evaluated the incidence of hematoma, infection, and/ or deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism. Chi-square and t tests were used for the analyses. Results: The TOPS and CosmetAssure databases included 7310 and 3350 patients with abdominoplasty and 30,831 and 14,227 patients with breast augmentation, respectively. In the TOPS and CosmetAssure populations, the complication rates for abdominoplasty were 0.9 percent and 0.5 percent with hematoma (p = 0.29), 3.5 percent and 0.7 percent with infection (p < 0.001), and 0.3 percent and 0.1 percent with deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (p = 0.05), respectively. The complication rates for breast augmentation in TOPS and CosmetAssure were 0.6 percent and 0.7 percent with hematoma (p = 0.21), 0.3 percent and 0.1 percent with infection (p < 0.001), and 0.02 percent and less than 0.01 percent with deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (p = 0.31), respectively. Conclusions: Complication rates for abdominoplasty and breast augmentation were similar in TOPS and CosmetAssure, providing a measure of cross-validation. The low complication rates support the safety of these procedures when they are performed by plastic surgeons. These data should be used by individual practitioners for outcomes benchmarking. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 124: 2127, 2009.)
引用
收藏
页码:2127 / 2133
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Alsarraf R, 2001, Arch Facial Plast Surg, V3, P198, DOI 10.1001/archfaci.3.3.198
[2]
[Anonymous], 2006, National Clearinghouse for Professions in Special Education
[3]
The role and education of doctors in the delivery of health care [J].
Chantler, C .
LANCET, 1999, 353 (9159) :1178-1181
[4]
Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: A comprehensive review of the literature [J].
Ching, S ;
Thoma, A ;
McCabe, RE ;
Antony, MM .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 111 (01) :469-480
[5]
The prevalence of negative studies with inadequate statistical power: An analysis of the plastic surgery literature [J].
Chung, KC ;
Kalliainen, LK ;
Spilson, SV ;
Walters, MR ;
Kim, HM .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 109 (01) :1-6
[6]
Preoperative risk factors and surgical complexity are more predictive of costs than postoperative complications - A case study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database [J].
Davenport, DL ;
Henderson, WG ;
Khuri, SF ;
Mentzer, RM .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2005, 242 (04) :463-471
[7]
Egger E, 1999, Health Care Strateg Manage, V17, P14
[8]
Finlayson SRG, 2006, AM SURGEON, V72, P1038
[9]
Flum D, 2006, AM SURGEON, V72, P1133
[10]
Flum DR, 2006, AM SURGEON, V72, P1061