Isolated upright gastroesophageal reflux is not a contraindication for antireflux surgery

Background. Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease who reflux only in the upright position are thought to have a less severe abnormality. Controversy exists over whether these patients should be considered candidates for antireflux surgery. Methods. A total of 224 consecutive patients with increased esophageal acid exposure on 24-hour pH monitoring were classified as having upright (n = 54), supine (n = 72), or bipositional (n = 98) reflux and were evaluated by manometry and endoscopy. Of these, 116 patients had a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Their clinical outcome at a median of 12 months (range 4 to 44 months) was compared. Results. Patients with upright reflux had a lower prevalence of a structurally defective lower esophageal sphincter, fewer hiatal hernias, and less esophageal injury when compared to those with bipositional reflux (p < 0.05). Excellent (asymptomatic) or good outcome (minor symptoms not requiring acid suppression therapy) was achieved in 86% of the patients with upright reflux, 90% of those with supine reflux, and 89% of those with bipositional reflux. Conclusions. Patients with upright reflux have less complicated, earlier disease and have results equivalent to those patients with supine and bipositional reflux after antireflux surgery.