An Apgar score for surgery

被引:378
作者
Gawande, Atul A.
Kwaan, Mary R.
Regenbogen, Scott E.
Lipsitz, Stuart A.
Zinner, Michael J.
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Surg, Ctr Surg & Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Boston, MA 02114 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.11.011
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Surgical teams have not had a routine, reliable measure of patient condition at the end of an operation. We aimed to develop an Apgar score for the field of surgery, an outcomes score that teams could calculate at the end of any general or vascular surgical procedure to accurately grade a patient's condition and chances of major complications or death. STUDY DESIGN: We derived our surgical score in a retrospective analysis of data from medical records and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for 303 randomly selected patients undergoing colectomy at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston. The primary outcomes measure was incidence of major complication or death within 30 days of operation. We validated the score in two prospective, randomly selected cohorts: 102 colectomy patients and 767 patients undergoing general or vascular operations at the same institution. RESULTS: A 10-point score based on a patient's estimated amount of blood loss, lowest heart rate, and lowest mean arterial pressure during general or vascular operations was significantly associated with major complications or death within 30 days (p < 0.0001; c-index = 0.72). Of 767 general and vascular surgery patients, 29 (3.8%) had a surgical score <= 4. Major complications or death occurred in 17 of these 29 patients (58.6%) within 30 days. By comparison, among 220 patients with scores of 9 or 10, only 8 (3.6%) experienced major complications or died (relative risk 16.1; 95% Cl, 7.6-34.0; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A simple score based on blood loss, heart rate, and blood pressure can be useful in rating the condition of patients after general or vascular operations.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 208
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] APGAR V, 1953, Curr Res Anesth Analg, V32, P260
  • [2] EVALUATION OF THE NEWBORN INFANT-2ND REPORT
    APGAR, V
    HOLADAY, DA
    JAMES, LS
    WEISBROT, IM
    BERRIEN, C
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1958, 168 (15): : 1985 - 1988
  • [3] β-blockers and reduction of cardiac events in noncardiac surgery -: Scientific review
    Auerbach, AD
    Goldman, L
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (11): : 1435 - 1444
  • [4] The continuing value of the apgar score for the assessment of newborn infants.
    Casey, BM
    McIntire, DD
    Leveno, KJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (07) : 467 - 471
  • [5] DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HANDWRITTEN AND AUTOMATIC BLOOD-PRESSURE RECORDS
    COOK, RI
    MCDONALD, JS
    NUNZIATA, E
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1989, 71 (03) : 385 - 390
  • [6] COPELAND GP, 1991, BRIT J SURG, V78, P356
  • [8] The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals - Initial demonstration of feasibility
    Fink, AS
    Campbell, DA
    Mentzer, RM
    Henderson, WG
    Daley, J
    Bannister, J
    Hur, K
    Khuri, SF
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 236 (03) : 344 - 354
  • [9] The Apgar score has survived the test of time
    Finster, M
    Wood, M
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 102 (04) : 855 - 857
  • [10] MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD LOSS AT OPERATION
    GARDINER, AJ
    DUDLEY, HAF
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1962, 34 (09) : 653 - &