Dilemmas in qualitative health research

被引:1168
作者
Yardley, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Dept Psychol, Southampton SO9 5NH, Hants, England
关键词
qualitative methods; qualitative analysis; validity; evaluation;
D O I
10.1080/08870440008400302
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
As the use of qualitative methods in health research proliferates, it becomes increasingly necessary to consider how the value of a piece of qualitative research should be assessed. This article discusses the problem posed by the novelty and diversity of qualitative approaches within health psychology and considers the question of what criteria are appropriate for assessing the validity of a qualitative analysis. In keeping with the ethos of much qualitative research, some open-ended, flexible principles are suggested as a guide to the quality of a qualitative study: sensitivity to context; commitment and rigour; transparency and coherence; impact and importance. Examples are given of the very different ways in which various forms of qualitative research can meet these criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 228
页数:14
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
ANDERSON WT, 1986, DISCOURSE I AUTHORIT, P78
[2]  
[Anonymous], DISCOURSE STRUCTURE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, CRITICAL ISSUES QUAL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, HDB QUALITATIVE RES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1984, DISCOURSE MED DIALEC
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1989, BIRTH CLIN
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1992, The Meaning of Illness
[8]  
[Anonymous], MAT DISCOURSES HLTH
[9]  
[Anonymous], QUALITATIVE RES THEO
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1997, DISCOURSE STUDIES MU