Child-adult differences in muscle strength and activation pattern during isometric elbow flexion and extension

被引:73
作者
Falk, Bareket [1 ]
Usselman, Charlotte [1 ]
Dotan, Raffy [1 ]
Brunton, Laura [1 ]
Klentrou, Panagiota [1 ]
Shaw, Jay [1 ]
Gabriel, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Brock Univ, Fac Appl Hlth Sci, Dept Phys Educ & Kinesiol, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
关键词
children; coactivation; EMG; maturation; neuromotor; strength; SINGLE-JOINT MOVEMENTS; PLANTAR FLEXOR MUSCLES; HUMAN SKELETAL-MUSCLE; PREPUBERTAL CHILDREN; MUSCULOTENDINOUS STIFFNESS; ORGANIZING PRINCIPLES; FORCE DEVELOPMENT; MOTOR-TASKS; YOUNG BOYS; EXERCISE;
D O I
10.1139/H09-020
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 [营养与食品卫生学];
摘要
Muscle strength and activation were compared in boys and men during maximal voluntary elbow flexion and extension contractions. Peak torque, peak rate of torque development (d tau/d tau(max)), rate of muscle activation, and electromechanical delay (EMD) were measured in 15 boys (aged 9.7 +/- 1.6 years) and 16 men (aged 22.1 +/- 2.8 years). During flexion, peak torque was significantly lower in boys than in men (19.5 +/- 5.8 vs. 68.5 +/- 11.0 Nm, respectively; p < 0.05), even when controlling for upper-arm cross-sectional area (CSA), and peak electromyography activity. Boys also exhibited a lower normalized d tau/d tau(max) (7.2 +/- 1.7 vs. 9.5 +/- 1.6 (Nm.s(-1)).(Nm(-1)), respectively; p < 0.05) and a significantly longer EMD (75.5 +/- 28.4 vs. 47.6 +/- 17.5 ms, respectively). The pattern was similar for extension, except that group differences in peak torque were no longer significant when normalized for CSA. These results suggest that children may be less able to recruit or fully utilize their higher-threshold motor units, resulting in lower dimensionally normalized maximal torque and rate of torque development.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 615
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]
Force development of dynamic and static contractions in children and adults [J].
Asai, H ;
Aoki, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1996, 17 (03) :170-174
[2]
Asmussen E, 1973, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY HU, P60
[3]
Evaluation of the strength-size relationship in vivo using various muscle size indices [J].
Bamman, MM ;
Newcomer, BR ;
Larson-Meyer, DE ;
Weinsier, RL ;
Hunter, GR .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2000, 32 (07) :1307-1313
[4]
BASSA H, 2005, PEDIAT EXERC SCI, V17, P65
[5]
CONTRACTILE PROPERTIES OF HUMAN SKELETAL-MUSCLE IN CHILDHOOD AND ADOLESCENCE [J].
BELANGER, AY ;
MCCOMAS, AJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY AND OCCUPATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 58 (06) :563-567
[6]
BLIMKIE C., 1989, PERSPECTIVES EXERCIS, V2, P99
[7]
Adaptations during familiarization to resistive exercise [J].
Calder, Kristina M. ;
Gabriel, David A. .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (03) :328-335
[8]
ELECTRO-MECHANICAL DELAY IN HUMAN SKELETAL-MUSCLE UNDER CONCENTRIC AND ECCENTRIC CONTRACTIONS [J].
CAVANAGH, PR ;
KOMI, PV .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1979, 42 (03) :159-163
[9]
Effects of velocity on upper to lower extremity muscular work and power output ratios of intercollegiate athletes [J].
Charteris, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1999, 33 (04) :250-254
[10]
ORGANIZING PRINCIPLES FOR SINGLE-JOINT MOVEMENTS .2. A SPEED-SENSITIVE STRATEGY [J].
CORCOS, DM ;
GOTTLIEB, GL ;
AGARWAL, GC .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 62 (02) :358-368