Another potential shortcoming of AHP

被引:43
作者
Perez, Joaquin [1 ]
Jimeno, Jose L. [1 ]
Mokotoff, Ethel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alcala de Henares, Dept Fundamentos Econ & Hist Econ, Alcala De Henares 28802, Spain
关键词
multiple criteria analysis; rank reversal; AHP; indifferent criteria;
D O I
10.1007/BF02579004
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In the last twenty years many features of Saaty's Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) have been criticised, especially the additive hierarchical composition of conventional AHP, which leads to the possibility of occurrence of the Rank Reversal phenomenon (adding an irrelevant alternative may cause a reversal in the ranking at the top). In this paper we show another feature of AHP which may be, and in many application contexts will indeed be, an even stronger shortcoming of the method. It consists in the fact that the addition of indifferent criteria (for which all alternatives perform equally) causes a significant alteration of the aggregated priorities of alternatives, with important consequences. In hierarchies with four or more levels, rank reversal may happen. Since in almost all applications of AHP the set of criteria is not fixed ex-ante but is variable and is constructed in accordance with reasons of relevance and simplicity, almost all applications of AHP are potentially flawed.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 111
页数:13
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, DECISION MAKING LEAD
[2]   ON A SHORT-COMING OF SAATY METHOD OF ANALYTIC HIERARCHIES [J].
BELTON, V ;
GEAR, T .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1983, 11 (03) :228-230
[3]   REMARKS ON THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
DYER, JS .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1990, 36 (03) :249-258
[4]   The analytic hierarchy process: can wash criteria be ignored? [J].
Finan, JS ;
Hurley, WJ .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2002, 29 (08) :1025-1030
[5]   The Analytic Hierarchy Process - An exposition [J].
Forman, EH ;
Gass, SI .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2001, 49 (04) :469-486
[6]   SOME COMMENTS ON SAATYS AHP [J].
PEREZ, J .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1995, 41 (06) :1091-1095
[7]   The Strong No Show Paradoxes are a common flaw in Condorcet voting correspondences [J].
Pérez, J .
SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2001, 18 (03) :601-616
[8]  
Saaty T.L., 1997, J MULTICRITERIA DECI, V6, P324, DOI [DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199711)6:6, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199711)6:63.0.CO
[9]  
2-Q, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199711)6:63.0.CO
[10]  
2-Q]