Spinal stenosis - Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment

被引:117
作者
Atlas, Steven J.
Delitto, Anthony
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Med Serv,Gen Med Div, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Med Serv,Clin Epidemiol Unit, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.blo.0000198722.70138.96
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Lumbar spinal stenosis is being diagnosed increasingly in older people as advanced imaging studies become more widely available and clinicians become more familiar with the presentation of this common condition. For symptomatic patients, the goal of treatment is pain relief and improved function, but there is little empiric evidence to support many of the common interventions used. The relative risks and benefits of various surgical and nonsurgical treatments are poorly understood, and the result has been wide variations in the evaluation and treatment of spinal stenosis across geographic regions. Current practice recommendations are based on expert opinion that incorporates available evidence into existing clinical and biologic paradigms. For most individuals, initial treatment should focus on patient education, medications to control pain, and exercise and physical treatments to regain or maintain activities of daily living. Surgical treatment most commonly is considered in patients not improving with nonsurgical care. Decompressive laminectomy is the standard surgical procedure for patients with spinal stenosis. The addition of fusion with or without instrumentation is considered when spinal stenosis is accompanied by degenerative spondylolisthesis or related to concerns about instability. We review the available evidence for nonsurgical and surgical interventions, and highlight comparative results wherever applicable.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 207
页数:10
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]
LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS - CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGIC FEATURES [J].
AMUNDSEN, T ;
WEBER, H ;
LILLEAS, F ;
NORDAL, HJ ;
ABDELNOOR, M ;
MAGNAES, B .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (10) :1178-1186
[2]
Lumbar spinal stenosis:: Conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10-year study [J].
Amundsen, T ;
Weber, H ;
Nordal, HJ ;
Magnaes, B ;
Abdelnoor, M ;
Lilleås, F .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (11) :1424-1435
[3]
Spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain - A meta-analysis of effectiveness relative to other therapies [J].
Assendelft, WJJ ;
Morton, SC ;
Yu, EI ;
Suttorp, MJ ;
Shekelle, PG .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (11) :871-881
[4]
The Maine Lumbar Spine Study .3. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis [J].
Atlas, SJ ;
Deyo, RA ;
Keller, RB ;
Chapin, AM ;
Patrick, DL ;
Long, JM ;
Singer, DE .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (15) :1787-1794
[5]
Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis - Four-year outcomes from the Maine lumbar spine study [J].
Atlas, SJ ;
Keller, RB ;
Robson, D ;
Deyo, RA ;
Singer, DE .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (05) :556-562
[6]
Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study [J].
Atlas, SJ ;
Keller, RB ;
Wu, YA ;
Deyo, RA ;
Singer, DE .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (08) :936-943
[7]
BIGOS S, 1994, PUBLICATION DEP HHS
[8]
Birkmeyer NJO, 2002, SPINE, V27, P1361, DOI 10.1097/00007632-200206150-00020
[9]
A report from the Second International Forum for Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain - Reexamining priorities [J].
Borkan, JM ;
Koes, B ;
Reis, S ;
Cherkin, DC .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (18) :1992-1996
[10]
LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS - DIAGNOSIS, MANAGEMENT, AND TREATMENT [J].
BRIDWELL, KH .
CLINICS IN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 1994, 10 (04) :677-701