The impact of input and output factors on emergency department throughput

被引:106
作者
Asaro, Phillip V. [1 ]
Lewis, Lawrence M.
Boxerman, Stuart B.
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Emergency Med Div, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Hlth Adm Program, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
crowding; hospital emergency services; bed occupancy; patient care; regression analysis;
D O I
10.1197/j.aem.2006.10.104
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: To quantify the impact of input and output factors on emergency department (ED) process outcomes while controlling for patient-level variables. Methods: Using patient- and system-level data from multiple sources, multivariate linear regression models were constructed with length of stay (LOS), wait time, treatment time, and boarding time as dependent variables. The products of the 20th to 80th percentile ranges of the input and output factor variables and their regression coefficients demonstrate the actual impact (in minutes) of each of these factors on throughput outcomes. Results: An increase from the 20th to the 80th percentile in ED arrivals resulted in increases of 42 minutes in wait time, 49 minutes in LOS (admitted patients), and 24 minutes in ED boarding time (admitted patients). For admit percentage (20th to 80th percentile), the increases were 12 minutes in wait time, 15 minutes in LOS, and 1 minute in boarding time. For inpatient bed utilization as of 7 AM (20th to 80th percentile), the increases were 4 minutes in wait time, 19 minutes in LOS, and 16 minutes in boarding time. For admitted patients boarded in the ED as of 7 AM (20th to 80th percentile), the increases were 35 minutes in wait time, 94 minutes in LOS, and 75 minutes in boarding time. Conclusions: Achieving significant improvement in ED throughput is unlikely without determining the most important factors on process outcomes and taking measures to address variations in ED input and bottlenecks in the ED output stream.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 242
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   A conceptual model of emergency department crowding [J].
Asplin, BR ;
Magid, DJ ;
Rhodes, KV ;
Solberg, LI ;
Lurie, N ;
Camargo, CA .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 42 (02) :173-180
[2]   Development and validation of a new index to measure emergency department crowding [J].
Bernstein, SL ;
Verghese, V ;
Leung, W ;
Lunney, AT ;
Perez, I .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 10 (09) :938-942
[3]   Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: Interrater agreement [J].
Beveridge, R ;
Ducharme, J ;
Janes, L ;
Beaulieu, S ;
Walter, S .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 34 (02) :155-159
[4]   FACTORS AFFECTING ED LENGTH-OF-STAY IN SURGICAL CRITICAL CARE PATIENTS [J].
DAVIS, B ;
SULLIVAN, S ;
LEVINE, A ;
DALLARA, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1995, 13 (05) :495-500
[5]   Overcrowding in the nation's emergency departments: Complex causes and disturbing effects [J].
Derlet, RW ;
Richards, JR .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2000, 35 (01) :63-68
[6]  
Derlet RW, 2002, SOUTH MED J, V95, P846
[7]   The emergency severity index triage algorithm version 2 is reliable and valid [J].
Eitel, DR ;
Travers, DA ;
Rosenau, AM ;
Gilboy, N ;
Wuerz, RC .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 10 (10) :1070-1080
[8]   Calculus, chaos, and other models of emergency department crowding [J].
Fields, WW .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 42 (02) :181-184
[9]  
*G WASH U MED CTR, 2004, BURST SEAMS IMPR PAT
[10]   Care in the emergency department: How crowded is overcrowded? [J].
Hwang, U ;
Concato, J .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 11 (10) :1097-1101