Recharge estimation for transient ground water modeling

被引:94
作者
Jyrkama, MI [1 ]
Sykes, JF [1 ]
Normani, SD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Civil Engn, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-6584.2002.tb02550.x
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Reliable ground water models require both an accurate physical representation of the system and appropriate boundary conditions. While physical attributes are generally considered static, boundary conditions, such as ground water recharge rates, can be highly variable in both space and time. A practical methodology incorporating the hydrologic model HELP3 in conjunction with a geographic information system was developed to generate a physically based and highly detailed recharge boundary condition for ground water modeling. The approach uses daily precipitation and temperature records in addition to land use/land cover and soils data. The importance of the method in transient ground water modeling is demonstrated by applying it to a MODFLOW modeling study in New Jersey. In addition to improved model calibration, the results from the study clearly indicate the importance of using a physically based and highly detailed recharge boundary condition in ground water quality modeling, where the detailed knowledge of the evolution of the ground water flowpaths is imperative. The simulated water table is within 0.5 m of the observed values using the method, while the water levels can differ by as much as 2 m using uniform recharge conditions. The results also show that the combination of temperature and precipitation plays an important role in the amount and timing of recharge in cooler climates. A sensitivity analysis further reveals that increasing the leaf area index, the evaporative zone depth, or the curve number in the model will result in decreased recharge rates over time, with the curve number having the greatest impact.
引用
收藏
页码:638 / 648
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recharge estimation for the Liverpool Plains
    Abbs, K
    Littleboy, M
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1998, 36 (02): : 335 - 357
  • [2] Anderson J.R., 1976, 964 US GEOL SURV, DOI DOI 10.3133/PP964
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1973, NATL WEATHER SERVICE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1994, EPA600R94168B
  • [5] [Anonymous], 53 COMM BUR SOILS
  • [6] [Anonymous], ARS8 USDA AGR RES SE
  • [7] Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment - Part 1: Model development
    Arnold, JG
    Srinivasan, R
    Muttiah, RS
    Williams, JR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1998, 34 (01): : 73 - 89
  • [8] ARNOLD JG, 1989, SWPRB SIMULATOR WATE
  • [9] Beverly CR, 1999, HYDROL PROCESS, V13, P653, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(19990415)13:5&lt
  • [10] 653::AID-HYP771&gt