An 8-center study to evaluate the utility of midterm genetic sonograms among high-risk pregnancies

被引:48
作者
Hobbins, JC
Lezotte, DC
Persutte, WH
DeVore, GR
Benacerraf, BR
Nyberg, DA
Vintzileos, AM
Platt, LD
Carlson, DE
Bahado-Singh, RO
Abuhamad, AZ
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Denver, CO 80262 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med & Biostat, Denver, CO 80262 USA
[3] Fetal Diagnost Ctr Pasadena & Alfigen, Inst Genet, Pasadena, CA USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[5] Pacific NW Diagnost Ultrasound, Seattle, WA USA
[6] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA USA
[7] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Dept Maternal Fetal Med & Obstet, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[8] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
[9] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, New Haven, CT USA
[10] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Norfolk, VA 23501 USA
关键词
Down syndrome; prenatal diagnosis; second trimester; ultrasonography;
D O I
10.7863/jum.2003.22.1.33
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective. A multicenter study was undertaken to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of a genetic sonogram. Methods. Eight centers provided data on 176 pregnancies complicated by fetal Down syndrome. One hundred thirty-four pregnancies were considered high risk because of advanced maternal age (>35 years), and 42 were considered high risk for having "abnormal" triple-screen results (risk >1:250). Each center provided fetal biometric data, information regarding the presence or absence of major structural abnormalities, and between 3 and 6 additional ultrasonographic markers for trisomy 21. The heterogeneity of our 8 independent "sensitivity estimates" was evaluated by Poisson regression, and a single combined estimate of the sensitivity was calculated. Results. Of the total 176 cases of trisomy 21, 125 fetuses (71.0%) had either an abnormal long bone length (femur length, humerus length, or both), a major structural abnormality, or a Down syndrome marker. The combined diagnostic sensitivity was 71.6%, with a range of 63.6% (7 of 11) to 80% (8 of 10). Five centers had sensitivity estimates falling between 64% and 76%. The sensitivity of individual markers varied between 3% (sandal gap) and 46.5% (nuchal skin fold thickness). A condensed regimen of nuchal skin fold thickness, femur length, and a standard anatomic survey would screen in 56.8% of fetuses with Down syndrome. Conclusions. This 8-center study that included many fetuses with Down syndrome validates the concept that the genetic sonogram can be used to better adjust the Down syndrome risk for high-risk patients.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 38
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
ALLISON PD, 1999, LOGISTIC REGRESSION, P103
[2]  
*AM I ULTR MED, 1994, STAND PERF ANT OBST
[3]   SONOGRAPHIC DIAGNOSIS OF DOWN SYNDROME IN THE 2ND TRIMESTER [J].
BENACERRAF, BR ;
FRIGOLETTO, FD ;
LABODA, LA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1985, 153 (01) :49-52
[4]   Trisomy 21: 91% detection rate using second-trimester ultrasound markers [J].
Devore, GR .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 16 (02) :133-141
[5]   EFFECT OF PRENATAL ULTRASOUND SCREENING ON PERINATAL OUTCOME [J].
EWIGMAN, BG ;
CRANE, JP ;
FRIGOLETTO, FD ;
LEFEVRE, ML ;
BAIN, RP ;
MCNELLIS, D .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 329 (12) :821-827
[6]  
Freeman SB, 1998, AM J MED GENET, V80, P213, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19981116)80:3<213::AID-AJMG6>3.3.CO
[7]  
2-#
[8]  
Pinette MG, 2001, J ULTRAS MED, V20, P639
[9]   Second-trimester ultrasound to detect fetuses with Down syndrome - A meta-analysis [J].
Smith-Bindman, R ;
Hosmer, W ;
Feldstein, VA ;
Deeks, JJ ;
Goldberg, JD .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (08) :1044-1055
[10]   Indication-specific accuracy of second-trimester genetic ultrasonography for the detection of trisomy 21 [J].
Vintzileos, AM ;
Guzman, ER ;
Smulian, JC ;
Day-Salvatore, DL ;
Knuppel, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (05) :1045-1048