A comparison of two and three-dimensional analyses of fatigue crack closure

被引:56
作者
Alizadeh, H.
Hills, D. A.
de Matos, P. F. P.
Nowell, D.
Pavier, M. J.
Paynter, R. J.
Smith, D. J.
Simandjuntak, S.
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Dept Mech Engn, Bristol BS8 1TR, Avon, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Engn Sci, Oxford OX1 3PJ, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
fatigue; crack closure; finite element analysis; strip yield model;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.03.014
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Plasticity-induced fatigue crack closure is an important mechanism in the reduction of the effective stress intensity factor range for a fatigue crack. A calculation of the level of reduction would allow more accurate predictions of fatigue crack growth rate. However, modelling plasticity-induced closure is not straightforward, particularly when the three-dimensional aspects of the problem are included. Some simplification is possible by reducing the problem to two dimensions, but it is not always clear how this can be achieved for practical crack geometries. In this work, two-dimensional plane stress and plane strain finite element analyses are used to predict crack opening in a centre-cracked plate. The results of these analyses are compared with those of a plane stress strip yield analysis and those of a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Results are obtained for different R-ratios and stress levels. Reasonable agreement is found between the plane stress finite element and strip yield results for higher levels of applied stress levels where an excessively high level of mesh refinement is not required. Plane stress finite element crack opening results agree with three-dimensional finite element results for the surface and plane strain finite element results agree with three-dimensional finite element results for the mid-thickness. The implications of the results for the behaviour of three-dimensional cracks are discussed. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 231
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MECH FATIGUE CRACK C
[2]   ANALYSIS OF CLOSURE IN FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH [J].
BUDIANSKY, B ;
HUTCHINSON, JW .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1978, 45 (02) :267-276
[3]   Effects of strain hardening and stress state on fatigue crack closure [J].
Chang, T ;
Guo, W .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE, 1999, 21 (09) :881-888
[4]   VARIATION OF CRACK-OPENING STRESSES IN 3-DIMENSIONS - FINITE THICKNESS PLATE [J].
CHERMAHINI, RG ;
BLOM, AF .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED FRACTURE MECHANICS, 1991, 15 (03) :267-276
[5]   A CLOSED-FORM SMALL-SCALE YIELDING COLLINEAR STRIP YIELD MODEL FOR STRAIN-HARDENING MATERIALS [J].
DANIEWICZ, SR .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 1994, 49 (01) :95-103
[6]  
Elber W., 1970, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, V2, P37, DOI 10.1016/0013-7944(70)90028-7
[7]   FINITE-ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF PLASTICITY-INDUCED CRACK CLOSURE UNDER PLANE-STRAIN CONDITIONS [J].
FLECK, NA .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 1986, 25 (04) :441-449
[8]  
Gill P. E., 1981, PRACTICAL OPTIMIZATI
[9]   The influence of cross-sectional thickness on fatigue crack growth [J].
Guo, W ;
Wang, CH ;
Rose, LRF .
FATIGUE & FRACTURE OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 1999, 22 (05) :437-444
[10]   Finite-element analysis of fatigue crack closure under plane strain conditions: stabilization behaviour and mesh size effect [J].
Lee, HJ ;
Song, JH .
FATIGUE & FRACTURE OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 2005, 28 (03) :333-342