A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: a Cochrane overview

被引:203
作者
Singh, Jasvinder A. [1 ]
Christensen, Robin [2 ]
Wells, George A. [3 ]
Suarez-Almazor, Maria E. [4 ]
Buchbinder, Rachelle [5 ]
Lopez-Olivo, Maria Angeles [4 ]
Ghogomu, Elizabeth Tanjong [6 ]
Tugwell, Peter [6 ]
机构
[1] Minneapolis VA Med Ctr, Div Rheumatol, Dept Med, Minneapolis, MN 55417 USA
[2] Frederiksberg Univ Hosp, Parker Inst, Musculoskeletal Stat Unit, Frederiksberg, Denmark
[3] Univ Ottawa, Inst Heart, Cardiovasc Res Reference Ctr, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Monash Univ, Monash Dept Clin Epidemiol, Cabrini Hosp, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Malvern, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Ottawa, Ctr Global Hlth, Inst Populat Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
ANTITUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR; INTERLEUKIN-1 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; DOUBLE-BLIND; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY; CONCOMITANT METHOTREXATE; COMBINATION THERAPY; WORK DISABILITY; FUSION PROTEIN; CLINICAL-TRIAL; PHASE-III;
D O I
10.1503/cmaj.091391
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background: We sought to compare the benefits and safety of 6 biologics (abatacept, adalimumab, anakinra, etanercept, infliximab and rituximab) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods: In this network meta-analysis, we included all completed and updated Cochrane reviews on biologics for rheumatoid arthritis. We included data from all placebo-controlled trials that used standard dosing regimens. The major outcomes were benefit (defined as a 50% improvement in patient- and physician-reported criteria of the American College of Rheumatology [ACR50]) and safety (determined by the number of withdrawals related to adverse events). We used mixed-effects logistic regression to carry out an indirect comparison of the treatment effects between biologics. Results: Compared with placebo, biologics were associated with a clinically important higher ACR50 rate (odds ratio [OR] 3.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.62-4.29) and a number needed to treat for benefit of 4 (95% CI 4-6). However, biologics were associated with more withdrawals related to adverse events (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.13-1.71), with a number needed to treat for harm of 52 (95% CI 29-152). Anakinra was less effective than all of the other biologics, although this difference was statistically significant only for the comparison with adalimumab (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21-0.99) and etanercept (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14-0.81). Adalimumab, anakinra and infliximab were more likely than etanercept to lead to withdrawals related to adverse events (adalimumab OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.18-3.04; anakinra OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.27-3.29; and infliximab OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.43-5.26). Interpretation: Given the limitations of indirect comparisons, anakinra was less effective than adalimumab and etanercept, and etanercept was safer than adalimumab, anakinra and infliximab. This summary of the evidence will help physicians and patients to make evidence-based choices about biologics for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
引用
收藏
页码:787 / 796
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]
Tumor necrosis factor alpha drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review and metaanalysis of efficacy and safety [J].
Alonso-Ruiz, Alberto ;
Pijoan, Jose Ignacio ;
Ansuategui, Eukene ;
Urkaregi, Arantxa ;
Calabozo, Marcelo ;
Quintana, Antonio .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2008, 9 (1)
[2]
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD004525
[3]
[Anonymous], 2009, INDIRECT EVIDENCE IN
[4]
THE AMERICAN-RHEUMATISM-ASSOCIATION 1987 REVISED CRITERIA FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS [J].
ARNETT, FC ;
EDWORTHY, SM ;
BLOCH, DA ;
MCSHANE, DJ ;
FRIES, JF ;
COOPER, NS ;
HEALEY, LA ;
KAPLAN, SR ;
LIANG, MH ;
LUTHRA, HS ;
MEDSGER, TA ;
MITCHELL, DM ;
NEUSTADT, DH ;
PINALS, RS ;
SCHALLER, JG ;
SHARP, JT ;
WILDER, RL ;
HUNDER, GG .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1988, 31 (03) :315-324
[5]
Methods of milk expression for lactating women [J].
Becker, Genevieve E. ;
McCormick, Felicia M. ;
Renfrew, Mary J. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2008, (04)
[6]
Effect of the Early Use of the Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Adalimumab on the Prevention of Job Loss in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis [J].
Bejarano, Victoria ;
Quinn, Mark ;
Conaghan, Philip G. ;
Reece, Richard ;
Keenan, Anne-Maree ;
Walker, David ;
Gough, Andrew ;
Green, Michael ;
McGonagle, Dennis ;
Adebajo, Ade ;
Jarrett, Stephen ;
Doherty, Sheelagh ;
Hordon, Lesley ;
Melsom, Richard ;
Unnebrink, Kristina ;
Kupper, Hartmut ;
Emery, Paul .
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2008, 59 (10) :1467-1474
[7]
Blumenauer B, 2002, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V2002, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD003785
[8]
The PREMIER study - A multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of combination therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone or adalimumab alone in patients with early, aggressive rheumatoid arthritis who had not had previous methotrexate treatment [J].
Breedveld, FC ;
Weisman, MH ;
Kavanaugh, AF ;
Cohen, SB ;
Pavelka, K ;
van Vollenhoven, R ;
Sharp, J ;
Perez, JL ;
Spencer-Green, GT .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2006, 54 (01) :26-37
[9]
Bresnihan B, 1998, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V41, P2196, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(199812)41:12<2196::AID-ART15>3.3.CO
[10]
2-U