3.0 Tesla imaging of the musculoskeletal system

被引:56
作者
Kuo, Raymond
Panchal, Mahendra
Tanenbaum, Larry
Crues, John V., III
机构
[1] Radnet Management Inc, Los Angeles, CA 90025 USA
[2] JFK Med Ctr, New Jersey Neurosci Inst, Edison, NJ USA
关键词
3.0; Tesla; magnetic resonance; musculoskeletal; MRI; signal-to-noise ratio; protocol optimization; clinical experience;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.20815
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
High-field MRI at 3.0T is rapidly gaining clinical acceptance and experiencing more widespread use. The superiority of high-field imaging has clearly been demonstrated for neurological imaging. The impact of 3.0T imaging of the musculoskeletal system has been less dramatic due to complex optimization issues. Areas under consideration include coil technology, protocol modification, artifact reduction, and patient safety: In this article we review these issues and describe our experience with 3.0T musculoskeletal MRI: Fundamentally, an increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is responsible for improved imaging at higher field strength: Increased SNR allows more headroom to adjust parameters that affect image resolution and examination time: It has been established that T1 relaxation time increases at 3.0T, while T2 time decreases. Consequently, scanner parameters require adjustment for optimization of images. Chemical shift and magnetic susceptibility: artifacts are more pronounced and require special techniques to minimize the effect on image quality: Spectral fat saturation techniques can take advantage of the increased chemical shift. The specific absorption rate (SAR) and acoustic noise thresholds must be kept in, mind at these higher fields. We additionally present some of the clinical issues we have experenced at 3.0T. A decision must be made as to whether to trade higher resolution for reduced scanning time. In general, we believe that routine imaging: at 3.0T increases diagnostic confidence; especially for evaluations of cartilaginous and ligamentous structures.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 261
页数:17
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]
Radio frequency magnetic field mapping of a 3 tesla birdcage coil: Experimental and theoretical dependence on sample properties [J].
Alecci, M ;
Collins, CM ;
Smith, MB ;
Jezzard, P .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2001, 46 (02) :379-385
[2]
Origin of a signal intensity loss artifact in fat-saturation MR imaging [J].
Axel, L ;
Kolman, L ;
Charafeddine, R ;
Hwang, SN ;
Stolpen, AH .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 (03) :911-915
[3]
EDGE ARTIFACTS IN MR IMAGES - CHEMICAL-SHIFT EFFECT [J].
BABCOCK, EE ;
BRATEMAN, L ;
WEINREB, JC ;
HORNER, SD ;
NUNNALLY, RL .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1985, 9 (02) :252-257
[4]
Neurostimulation systems: Assessment of magnetic field interactions associated with 1.5-and 3-Tesla MR systems [J].
Baker, KB ;
Nyenhuis, JA ;
Hrdlicka, G ;
Rezai, AR ;
Tkach, JA ;
Shellock, FG .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2005, 21 (01) :72-77
[5]
Bernstein MA, 2001, MAGNET RESON MED, V46, P955, DOI 10.1002/mrm.1282
[6]
BOESCH C, 2006, CLIN MAGNETIC RESONA, V1, P459
[7]
RF MAGNETIC-FIELD PENETRATION, PHASE-SHIFT AND POWER DISSIPATION IN BIOLOGICAL TISSUE - IMPLICATIONS FOR NMR IMAGING [J].
BOTTOMLEY, PA ;
ANDREW, ER .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1978, 23 (04) :630-643
[8]
BOTTOMLEY PA, 1984, MED PHYS, V11, P425, DOI 10.1118/1.595535
[9]
CENTRAL NERVOUS-SYSTEM HIGH-RESOLUTION MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING - EFFECT OF INCREASING SPATIAL-RESOLUTION ON RESOLVING POWER [J].
BRADLEY, WG ;
KORTMAN, KE ;
CRUES, JV .
RADIOLOGY, 1985, 156 (01) :93-98
[10]
BYDDER G M, 1985, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, V3, P251, DOI 10.1016/0730-725X(85)90354-6