Autonomous decentralized structural health monitoring using smart sensors

被引:40
作者
Nagayama, T. [2 ]
Spencer, B. F., Jr. [1 ]
Rice, Jennifer A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Univ Tokyo, Dept Civil Engn, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138656, Japan
[3] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
structural health monitoring; decentralized computing; smart sensor;
D O I
10.1002/stc.352
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Though smart sensor technology has seen substantial advances during recent years, implementation of smart sensors on full-scale structures has been limited. Direct replacement of wired sensing systems with wireless sensor networks is not straightforward as off-the-shelf wireless systems are unlikely to provide the data users expect. The difficulty arises, in part, because centralized systems common for wired measurements are not scalable to large numbers of smart sensors. Decentralized computing is required to harvest the rich information that a dense array of smart sensors can make available for structural health monitoring (SHM). Decentralized system can be effectively managed by each sensor node and cluster autonomously performing tasks such as sensing and damage detection. Taking advantage of recent developments in middleware services which provide basic functionality for structural vibration measurements (e.g. synchronized sensing and reliable communication) this paper proposes an autonomous decentralized SHM approach using smart sensors. A set of algorithms that mesh well with the decentralized approach are first proposed and implemented on smart sensors. Finally, experimental validation of the implemented system is given and its damage detection capability is discussed. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:842 / 859
页数:18
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Load vectors for damage localization [J].
Bernal, D .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 2002, 128 (01) :7-14
[2]   Flexibility-based damage localization from stochastic realization results [J].
Bernal, Dionisio .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2006, 132 (06) :651-658
[3]  
CHINTLAPUDI K, 2006, P 5 INT C INF PROC S
[4]   Distributed computing strategy for structural health monitoring [J].
Gao, Y ;
Spencer, BF ;
Ruiz-Sandoval, M .
STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2006, 13 (01) :488-507
[5]  
GAO Y, 2008, NEWMARK STRUCTURAL E, V11
[6]  
James III GH, 1993, No. SAND-92-1666
[7]   AN EIGENSYSTEM REALIZATION-ALGORITHM FOR MODAL PARAMETER-IDENTIFICATION AND MODEL-REDUCTION [J].
JUANG, JN ;
PAPPA, RS .
JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1985, 8 (05) :620-627
[8]  
Lynch J. P., 2006, Shock and Vibration Digest, V38, P91, DOI 10.1177/0583102406061499
[9]   Issues in structural health monitoring employing smart sensors [J].
Nagayama, T. ;
Sim, S. H. ;
Miyamori, Y. ;
Spencer, B. F., Jr. .
SMART STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS, 2007, 3 (03) :299-320
[10]   Middleware services for structural health monitoring using smart sensors [J].
Nagayama, T. ;
Spencer, B. F., Jr. ;
Mechitov, K. A. ;
Agha, G. A. .
SMART STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS, 2009, 5 (02) :119-137