In vitro activity of ertapenem against common clinical isolates in relation to human pharmacokinetics

被引:19
作者
Friedland, I [1 ]
Mixson, LA [1 ]
Majumdar, A [1 ]
Motyl, M [1 ]
Woods, GL [1 ]
机构
[1] Merck Res Labs, W Point, PA USA
关键词
ertapenem; pharmacokinetics; community-acquired infections; mixed aerobic-anaerobic infections;
D O I
10.1179/joc.2002.14.5.483
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
The in vitro activity of ertapenem against bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with moderate to severe complicated intra-abdominal, complicated skin/skin structure, acute pelvic, or complicated urinary tract infection or community acquired pneumonia was compared to ceftriaxone and piperacillin-tazobactam and related to known plasma concentrations of the three agents. Ertapenem was more potent against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) than ceftriaxone and piperacillin-tazobactam and was more potent and more active than both of these agents against Enterobacteriaceae and anaerobes. Piperacillin-tazobactam was the most active agent against enterococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All isolates of Enterobacteriaceae (n=1088), Streptococcus pyogenes (n=37), Streptococcus agalactiae (n=48), MSSA (n=187), Haemophilus influenzae (n=59), and Moraxella catarrhalis (n=9) were susceptible to ertapenem; <1% of 1284 anaerobes and only 1 of 113 Streptococcus pneumoniae (a penicillin-resistant isolate) were resistant to ertapenem. The MIC value at which 90% of all Enterobacteriaceae, streptococci, MSSA, H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, and anaerobes were inhibited (MIC90) was less than or equal to1 mug/ml and below the mean plasma concentration of total ertapenem following a 1 g intravenous infusion for at least 24 hours, i.e., the entire recommended dosing interval, and below the free drug concentration for at least 8 h.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 491
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
Barie P S, 2000, Surg Infect (Larchmt), V1, P91, DOI 10.1089/109629600321128
[2]
Management of complicated intra-abdominal infections [J].
Barie, PS .
JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 1999, 11 (06) :464-477
[3]
Barie PS, 1997, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V132, P1294
[4]
Bartlett John G., 2000, Clinical Infectious Diseases, V31, P347, DOI 10.1086/313954
[5]
DEFINITION OF THE ROLE OF ENTEROCOCCUS IN INTRAABDOMINAL INFECTION - ANALYSIS OF A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
BURNETT, RJ ;
HAVERSTOCK, DC ;
DELLINGER, EP ;
REINHART, HH ;
BOHNEN, JM ;
ROTSTEIN, OD ;
VOGEL, SB ;
SOLOMKIN, JS .
SURGERY, 1995, 118 (04) :716-723
[6]
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: Rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men [J].
Craig, WA .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1998, 26 (01) :1-10
[7]
In vitro activities of ertapenem (MK-0826) against clinical bacterial isolates from 11 North American medical centers [J].
Fuchs, PC ;
Barry, AL ;
Brown, SD .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2001, 45 (06) :1915-1918
[8]
GALL S, 1990, J REPROD MED S11, V35, P1092
[9]
Comparative in vitro activities of ertapenem (MK-0826) against 1,001 anaerobes isolated from human intra-abdominal infections [J].
Goldstein, EJC ;
Citron, DM ;
Merriam, CV ;
Warren, Y ;
Tyrrell, KL .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2000, 44 (09) :2389-2394
[10]
Ertapenem once daily versus piperacillin-tazobactam 4 times per day for treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections in adults: Results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study [J].
Graham, DR ;
Lucasti, C ;
Malafaia, O ;
Nichols, RL ;
Holtom, P ;
Perez, NQ ;
McAdams, A ;
Woods, GL ;
Ceesay, TP ;
Gesser, R .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 34 (11) :1460-1468