Amplification of Sensitivity Analysis in Matched Observational Studies

被引:94
作者
Rosenbaum, Paul R. [1 ]
Silber, Jeffrey H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Dept Stat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Amplification; Causal effects; Observational study; Sensitivity analysis; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; OVARIAN-CANCER; STATISTICS; ESTIMATORS; PROGRAM; TESTS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1198/jasa.2009.tm08470
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
A sensitivity analysis displays the increase in uncertainty that attends an inference when a key assumption is relaxed. In matched observational studies of treatment effects, a key assumption in some analyses is that subjects matched for observed covariates are comparable, and this assumption is relaxed by positing a relevant covariate that was not observed and not controlled by matching. What properties would such an unobserved covariate need to have to materially alter the inference about treatment effects? For ease of calculation and reporting, it is convenient that the sensitivity analysis be of low dimension, perhaps indexed by a scalar sensitivity parameter, but for interpretation in specific contexts, a higher dimensional analysis may be of greater relevance. An amplification of a sensitivity analysis is defined as a map from each point in a low-dimensional sensitivity analysis to a set of points, perhaps a "curve," in a higher dimensional sensitivity analysis such that the possible inferences are the same for all points in the set. Possessing an amplification, an investigator may calculate and report the low-dimensional analysis, yet have available the interpretations of the higher dimensional analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:1398 / 1405
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Bounding a matching estimator: the case of a Norwegian training program [J].
Aakvik, A .
OXFORD BULLETIN OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2001, 63 (01) :115-143
[2]   GENERALIZED ASSOCIATION, WITH APPLICATIONS IN MULTIVARIATE STATISTICS [J].
AHMED, AHN ;
LEON, R ;
PROSCHAN, F .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1981, 9 (01) :168-176
[3]  
BROSS IDJ, 1961, CANCER, V13, P394
[4]  
BROWN BM, 1981, BIOMETRIKA, V68, P235, DOI 10.1093/biomet/68.1.235
[5]   LOCALLY MOST POWERFUL TESTS FOR DETECTING TREATMENT EFFECTS WHEN ONLY A SUBSET OF PATIENTS CAN BE EXPECTED TO RESPOND TO TREATMENT [J].
CONOVER, WJ ;
SALSBURG, DS .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (01) :189-196
[6]   Local sensitivity approximations for selectivity bias [J].
Copas, J ;
Eguchi, S .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2001, 63 :871-895
[7]  
CORNFIELD J, 1959, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V22, P173
[8]  
DAWID AP, 1979, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V41, P1
[9]   Assessing bias in the estimation of causal effects: Rosenbaum bounds on matching estimators and instrumental variables estimation with imperfect instruments [J].
DiPrete, TA ;
Gangl, M .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY, 2004, VOL 34, 2004, 34 :271-310
[10]  
Fisher Ronald A., 1935, DESIGN EXPT