Validation of an instrument for the documentation of clinical pharmacists' interventions

被引:136
作者
Allenet, Benoit
Bedouch, Pierrick
Rose, Francois-Xavier
Escofier, Laurence
Roubille, Renaud
Charpiat, Bruno
Juste, Michel
Conort, Ornella
机构
[1] Univ Grenoble 1, CNRS, UMR 5525, ThEMAS,TIMC,IMAG, F-38043 Grenoble, France
[2] CHU Grenoble, F-38043 Grenoble, France
[3] Ctr Hosp Univ Hotel Dieu, Rennes, France
[4] Ctr Hosp Nord Mayenne, Mayenne, France
[5] Ctr Hosp Lucien Hussel, Vienne, France
[6] Hop Croix Rousse, Hospices Civils Lyon, F-69317 Lyon, France
[7] Ctr Hosp Auban Moet, Epernay, France
[8] Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Hop Cochin, Paris, France
[9] CHU Grenoble, F-38043 Grenoble 09, France
来源
PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE | 2006年 / 28卷 / 04期
关键词
clinical pharmacist; clinical pharmacy; documentation; France; intervention;
D O I
10.1007/s11096-006-9027-5
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective To validate an instrument for documentation of clinical pharmacy interventions in French speaking hospitals in France and outside of France. Method A panel of 12 French speaking clinical pharmacists (six from France; six from French speaking countries) was asked to analyse a set of 60 pharmacist's interventions on drug prescription. They used a form including (1) the identification of the drug related problems (DRPs) (10 items), (2) the pharmacist's intervention (7 items). We assessed the level of agreement between the 12 pharmacists on the test DRPs and on the interventions. Main outcome measures Kappa coefficient of concordance was used to assess the level of agreement between experts for DRPs and interventions. We also assessed the userfriendliness of the instrument using Likert scales. Results The level of concordance observed in the validation was 0.76 for DRPs and 0.89 for the type of intervention. Eleven experts out of 12 were "very satisfied" or "satisfied" and one "not satisfied" with the tool. Ten out of the 12 experts were ready to use it in daily practise. Conclusion The present instrument proposed by the French Society of Clinical Pharmacy (SFPC) is the first coding system for pharmacist's interventions with a French interface. The validation process using a standard statistical methodology helps support the external validity of our tool. The level of concordance between users can be considered as satisfactory, allowing the use of the tool in daily clinical pharmacy practise. To enhance the diffusion of the instrument and of the general process of routine documentation of interventions, a spreadsheet is provided on the French Society of Clinical Pharmacy website.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 188
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Clinical pharmacy services, pharmacy staffing, and the total cost of care in United States hospitals [J].
Bond, CA ;
Raehl, CL ;
Franke, T .
PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2000, 20 (06) :609-621
[2]  
Bright JM, 2000, AUST J HOSP PHARM, V30, P10, DOI DOI 10.1002/JPPR200030110
[3]   The effectiveness of hospital pharmacy in the UK: methodology for finding the evidence [J].
Child, D ;
Cantrill, J ;
Cooke, J .
PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE, 2004, 26 (01) :44-51
[4]  
Conort O., 2004, Journal de Pharmacie Clinique, V23, P141
[5]  
*FRENCH AG HLTH PR, THES DRUG DRUG INT
[6]  
KRAMER HC, 1988, J CLIN EPDIEMIOL, V41, P959
[7]   Cost savings and avoidance from clinical interventions [J].
Mutnick, AH ;
Sterba, KJ ;
Peroutka, JA ;
Sloan, NE ;
Beltz, EA ;
Sorenson, MK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 1997, 54 (04) :392-396
[8]  
*PHARM CAR NETW EU, DRP CLASS V5 0
[9]   Discussing basic principles for a coding system of drug-related problems:: the case of PI-Doc® [J].
Schaefer, M .
PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE, 2002, 24 (04) :120-127
[10]   Evidence of the economic benefit of clinical pharmacy services: 1996-2000 [J].
Schumock, GT ;
Butler, MG ;
Meek, PD ;
Vermeulen, LC ;
Arondekar, BV ;
Bauman, JL .
PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2003, 23 (01) :113-132