Technical progress, structural change, and the environmental Kuznets curve

被引:87
作者
Pasche, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jena, Fac Econ, D-07743 Jena, Germany
关键词
environmental Kuznets curve; technical progress; structural change; sustainability;
D O I
10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00135-0
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The paper shows that under reasonable assumptions about technical progress a positive sustainable growth rate fails to exist. The argument is that a growing part of income has to be spent for continuing technical progress in order to compensate the pollution effects of growth. Hence in the long run either the sustainability condition will be violated or the growth rate must decline to zero. Furthermore, in finite time the level of wealth will decrease despite growing income and a constant pollution level, thus further growth is no longer reasonable. Similar arguments also hold for the environmental effects of structural change favoring less pollution-intensive economic activities. An evolutionary change of goods and production technology may shift the limits of growth and is hence a prerequisite for a long-run EKC. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 389
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Andreoni J., 1998, NBER WORKING PAPER S
[2]  
Arrow K, 1995, ECOL ECON, V15, P91, DOI 10.1016/0921-8009(95)00059-3
[3]  
BUCHHOLZ W, 1980, Z WIRTSCHAFTS SOZIAL, V100, P141
[4]   The Kuznets curve for the environment and economic growth: Examining the evidence [J].
Ekins, P .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1997, 29 (05) :805-830
[5]  
JONES LE, 1995, NBER WORKING PAPER, V5205
[6]   THE ENVIRONMENT AS A FACTOR OF PRODUCTION - THE EFFECTS OF ECONOMIC-GROWTH AND TRADE LIBERALIZATION [J].
LOPEZ, R .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1994, 27 (02) :163-184
[7]  
Lovins A. B., 1997, FACTOR 4 DOUBLING WE
[8]  
*OECD, 1997, EC
[9]   NEOCLASSICAL GROWTH, THE J-CURVE FOR ABATEMENT, AND THE INVERTED U-CURVE FOR POLLUTION [J].
SELDEN, TM ;
SONG, DQ .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1995, 29 (02) :162-168
[10]  
*STAT BUND, 2000, FACHS STAT BUND 3, V19