Assessment in long-term care

被引:32
作者
Kane, RL [1 ]
Kane, RA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
measurement; mandatory assessment; preferences; care planning;
D O I
10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.659
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Long-term care has begun to rely heavily on assessment as a basis for determining eligibility and payment fur services, as well as for planning needed care. Mandated assessments have been introduced into nursing homes and will soon be required for home health care and rehabilitation. Many states use a formal structured assessment process to establish clients' eligibility for institutional or community-based care. The common feature of such assessment is attention to physical functioning, but other domains are also relevant, including affect, social function, cognition, pain and discomfort, and satisfaction. Taken together, this cluster is often referred to as quality of life. While some measures attempt to infer this information from clients' behavior, it is best obtained directly from clients' responses whenever possible. The other major component of a long term care assessment relates to obtaining information on clients' preferences and values. These data are important both for weighting the individual components of an assessment and for directly addressing preferences about the care and lifestyle available.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 686
页数:28
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
ABRAMS RC, 1994, ALZ DIS ASSOC DIS, V8, pS227
[2]  
ALBERT SM, 1999, J MENT HLTH AGING, V5, P33
[3]   Conceptualization and measurement of quality of life in dementia: The dementia quality of life instrument (DQoL) [J].
Brod, M ;
Stewart, AL ;
Sands, L ;
Walton, P .
GERONTOLOGIST, 1999, 39 (01) :25-35
[4]  
CARCAGNO GJ, 1988, HEALTH SERV RES, V23, P1
[5]   Care-related preferences and values of elderly community-based LTC consumers: Can case managers learn what's important to clients? [J].
Degenholtz, H ;
Kane, RA ;
Kivnick, HQ .
GERONTOLOGIST, 1997, 37 (06) :767-776
[6]   USING PROXIES TO EVALUATE QUALITY OF LIFE - CAN THEY PROVIDE VALID INFORMATION ABOUT PATIENTS HEALTH-STATUS AND SATISFACTION WITH MEDICAL-CARE [J].
EPSTEIN, AM ;
HALL, JA ;
TOGNETTI, J ;
SON, LH ;
CONANT, L .
MEDICAL CARE, 1989, 27 (03) :S91-S98
[7]   Effect of the National Resident Assessment Instrument on selected health conditions and problems [J].
Fries, BE ;
Hawes, C ;
Morris, JN ;
Phillips, CD ;
Mor, V ;
Park, PS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1997, 45 (08) :994-1001
[8]   Approaching cross-national comparisons of nursing home residents [J].
Fries, BE ;
Schroll, M ;
Hawes, C ;
Gilgen, R ;
Jonsson, PV ;
Park, P .
AGE AND AGEING, 1997, 26 :13-18
[9]   PERFORMANCE PROFILES OF THE FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE [J].
GRANGER, CV ;
HAMILTON, BB ;
LINACRE, JM ;
HEINEMANN, AW ;
WRIGHT, BD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1993, 72 (02) :84-89
[10]   Does it matter whom and how you ask? Inter- and intra-rater agreement in the Ontario Health Survey [J].
Grootendorst, PV ;
Feeny, DH ;
Furlong, W .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (02) :127-135