Changes in lifting dynamics after localized arm fatigue

被引:36
作者
Chen, YL [1 ]
机构
[1] Mingchi Inst Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Taipei 243, Taiwan
关键词
arm fatigue; lifting strategy; L5/S1 compressive forces;
D O I
10.1016/S0169-8141(99)00048-7
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The purposes of this study were (1) to compare the lifting strategies during arm fatigue and non-fatigue conditions and (2) to evaluate the effects of localized arm fatigue on L5/S1 compressive forces during lifting. The hypothesis was that isometrically induced arm fatigue can alter the lifting strategy selection resulting in an increase in the initial acceleration and leading to an increase in lower back stress. Biomechanical analyses of lifting were done before and after the performance of holding activity to induce arm muscle fatigue, Differences in the lifting strategies used including the accelerated effect, pre-lifting technique, and stiffening of the arms were monitored to determine their influence on L5/S1 compressive forces under various load and range conditions. The results show that lifting strategy changed significantly after arm fatigue, especially when the load was less than 20 kg. These changes included the use of increasingly stooped and accelerated techniques adopted at the beginning of the lift and stiffening of the arms at the end of the lift. Arm fatigue resulted in increased compressive forces at the L5/S1 disc due to the use of accelerated techniques and the inherent disadvantage of these techniques in the pre-lifting posture. In this study, lifting strategies changed as a function of arm fatigue, resulting in increased lower back loading. These findings suggest that whole-body lifting should be avoided after localized arm fatigue in order to decrease the risk of injury to the lower back.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 619
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS IN MANUAL MATERIALS HANDLING - THE STATE-OF-THE-ART [J].
AYOUB, MM .
ERGONOMICS, 1992, 35 (7-8) :713-728
[2]   MODEL FOR STATIC LIFTING - RELATIONSHIP OF LOADS ON THE SPINE AND THE KNEE [J].
BEJJANI, FJ ;
GROSS, CM ;
PUGH, JW .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1984, 17 (04) :281-286
[3]   Toward a quantitative definition of manual lifting postures [J].
BurgessLimerick, R ;
Abernethy, B .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1997, 39 (01) :141-148
[4]   INFLUENCE OF DYNAMIC FACTORS ON THE LUMBAR SPINE MOMENT IN LIFTING [J].
BUSHJOSEPH, C ;
SCHIPPLEIN, O ;
ANDERSSON, GBJ ;
ANDRIACCHI, TP .
ERGONOMICS, 1988, 31 (02) :211-216
[5]  
CADY LD, 1979, J OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V21, P269
[6]   LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF LOW-BACK PAIN AS ASSOCIATED WITH OCCUPATIONAL WEIGHT LIFTING FACTORS [J].
CHAFFIN, DB ;
PARK, KS .
AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1973, 34 (12) :513-525
[7]  
CHEN YD, 1996, THESIS NATL TAIWAN U
[8]   A non-invasive protocol for the determination of lumbosacral vertebral angle [J].
Chen, YL ;
Lee, YH .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1997, 12 (03) :185-189
[9]  
DAVIS PR, 1965, J ANAT, V99, P12
[10]  
DEMPSTER WT, 1955, 55159 WADC TR AER ME