Comparison of Commission on Cancer-Approved and -Nonapproved Hospitals in the United States: Implications for Studies That Use the National Cancer Data Base

被引:337
作者
Bilimoria, Karl Y. [1 ]
Bentrem, David J.
Stewart, Andrew K.
Winchester, David P.
Ko, Clifford Y.
机构
[1] Amer Coll Surg, Div Res & Optimal Patient Care, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
IMPROVEMENT; CARE;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7018
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The Commission on Cancer (CoC) designates cancer programs on the basis of the ability to provide a wide range of oncologic services and specialists. All CoC-approved hospitals are required to report their cancer diagnoses to the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), and the cancer diagnoses at these hospitals account for approximately 70% of all new cancers diagnosed in the United States annually. However, it is unknown how CoC-approved programs compare with non-CoC-approved hospitals. Methods By using the American Hospital Association Annual Survey Database (2006), CoC-approved and non-CoC-approved hospitals were compared with respect to structural characteristics (ie, accreditations, geography, and oncologic services provided). Results Of the 4,850 hospitals identified, 1,412 (29%) were CoC-approved hospitals, and 3,438 (71%) were not CoC-approved hospitals. The proportion of CoC-approved hospitals varied at the state level from 0% in Wyoming to 100% in Delaware. Compared with non-CoC-approved hospitals, CoC-approved programs were more frequently accredited by the Joint Commission, designated as a Comprehensive Cancer Center by the National Cancer Institute, and affiliated with a medical school or residency program (P < .001). CoC-approved hospitals were less likely to be critical access hospitals or located in rural areas (P < .001). CoC-approved hospitals had more total beds and performed more operations per year (P < .001). CoC-approved programs more frequently offered oncology-related services, including screening programs, chemotherapy and radiation therapy services, and hospice/palliative care (P < .001). Conclusion Compared with non-CoC-approved hospitals, CoC-approved hospitals were larger, were more frequently located in urban locations, and had more cancer-related services available to patients. Studies that use the NCDB should acknowledge this limitation when relevant.
引用
收藏
页码:4177 / 4181
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
American Hospital Association, ANN SURV DAT
[2]  
[Anonymous], SEER SURV EP END RES
[3]   Directing surgical quality improvement initiatives: Comparison of perioperative mortality and long-term survival for cancer surgery [J].
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Bentrem, David J. ;
Feinglass, Joseph M. ;
Stewart, Andrew K. ;
Winchester, David P. ;
Talamonti, Mark S. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (28) :4626-4633
[4]   Lymph node evaluation as a colon cancer quality measure: A national hospital report card [J].
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Bentrem, David J. ;
Stewart, Andrew K. ;
Talamonti, Mark S. ;
Winchester, David P. ;
Russell, Thomas R. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2008, 100 (18) :1310-1317
[5]   The National Cancer Data Base: A powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States [J].
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Stewart, Andrew K. ;
Winchester, David P. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (03) :683-690
[6]  
*COMM CANC, CANC PROGR ACCR CAT
[7]   Using the NCDB for Cancer Care Improvement: An Introduction to Available Quality Assessment Tools [J].
Raval, Mehul V. ;
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Stewart, Andrew K. ;
Bentrem, David J. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 99 (08) :488-490
[8]  
U.S. Department of Agriculture, MEAS RUR RUR URB COM
[9]  
*U WASH RUR HLTH R, RUR URB COMM AR COD