Contrast-enhanced 3D FISP MR angiography of the aortic arch ostia: Preliminary results

被引:6
作者
Stone, JA [1 ]
Mukherji, SK
Semelka, R
Kelekis, N
Neelon, B
Castillo, M
机构
[1] Med Coll Georgia, Dept Radiol, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
关键词
aorta; magnetic resonance; angiography; (MRA);
D O I
10.1097/00004728-200005000-00003
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
Purpose: The goal of this work was to evaluate three-dimensional (3D) contrast-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) for the detection of ostial stenoses of the aortic arch. Method: Sixteen patients with suspected carotid atherosclerotic disease prospectively underwent digital subtraction angiography of the aortic arch followed by contrast-enhanced MRA using a 3D fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) technique (TR = 5 ms, TE = 2 ms,flip angle = 30 degrees). Three neuroradiologists blindly measured stenoses on the catheter angiograms and MRA. Evaluation included the ostia of the innominate, left carotid, and left subclavian arteries. Any significant disagree ment on catheter angiography was resolved by consensus. The MRA grades of each of the three observers were then compared with the consensus grades of the contrast angiogram. Results: Forty-eight vessels were scored, of which five had significant stenoses. MRA demonstrated 100% sensitivity, 89% specificity, 52% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value. The Bowker test for symmetry indicated no significant difference between conventional angiography and MRA scores (p = 0.32-0.75), and there was good agreement between the three observers (weighted kappa = 0.75-0.86). Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced 3D FISP MRA may be a useful imaging modality for the detection of significant stenoses at the ostia of the major aortic arch branches.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 374
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[2]
MR-ANGIOGRAPHY OF OCCLUSIVE DISEASE OF THE ARTERIES IN THE HEAD AND NECK - CURRENT CONCEPTS [J].
BOWEN, BC ;
QUENCER, RM ;
MARGOSIAN, P ;
PATTANY, PM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (01) :9-18
[3]
Magnetic resonance angiography of the aortic arch [J].
Carpenter, JP ;
Holland, GA ;
Golden, MA ;
Barker, CF ;
Lexa, FJ ;
Gilfeather, M ;
Schnall, MD .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1997, 25 (01) :145-151
[4]
Carr J J, 1994, Neuroimaging Clin N Am, V4, P43
[5]
CHERRY KJ, 1998, VASCULAR INTERVENTIO
[6]
3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries [J].
Cloft, HJ ;
Murphy, KJ ;
Prince, MR ;
Brunberg, JA .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1996, 14 (06) :593-600
[7]
DEBRAY JM, 1995, NEURORADIOLOGY, V37, P219
[8]
ROLE OF DOPPLER US IN SCREENING FOR CAROTID ATHEROSCLEROTIC DISEASE [J].
DERDEYN, CP ;
POWERS, WJ ;
MORAN, CJ ;
CROSS, DT ;
ALLEN, BT .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 (03) :635-643
[9]
Carotid artery stenosis: External validity of the North American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial measurement method [J].
Eliasziw, M ;
Fox, AJ ;
Sharpe, BL ;
Barnett, HJM .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 204 (01) :229-233
[10]
MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY OF EXTRACRANIAL CAROTID AND VERTEBRAL ARTERIES, INCLUDING THEIR ORIGINS - COMPARISON WITH DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
FURUYA, Y ;
ISODA, H ;
HASEGAWA, S ;
TAKAHASHI, M ;
KANEKO, M ;
UEMURA, K .
NEURORADIOLOGY, 1992, 35 (01) :42-45