Approach versus avoidance goals: Differences in self-evaluation and well-being

Proceeding from a model of feature-positive goal monitoring two studies tested hypothesized associations between approach goat and positive self-evaluations and between avoidance goals and negative self-evaluations. The existence of feature-positive searches in goal monitoring was expected to bias self-evaluations toward perceiving success for approach goals and failure for avoidance goals. Study I established the existence of a relationship between goal framing and global self-evaluations, or psychological well-being; subjects with more avoidance goals evaluated themselves more negatively on measures of self-esteem, optimism, and depression. Study 2 confirmed the causal role of goal framing in this relationship, for self-perceptions of success and satisfaction differed as a function of manipulated approach versus avoidance goals.