Low-cost laparoscopic cholecystectomy

被引:26
作者
Champault, A [1 ]
Vons, C [1 ]
Dagher, I [1 ]
Amerlinck, S [1 ]
Franco, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Sud, Hop Antoine Beclere, Serv Chirurg Gen & Digest, F-92141 Clamart, France
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02273.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Hospital managers are continually trying to decrease the cost of patient care. The aim of this prospective study was to propose changes that would decrease the operating room costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy without affecting clinical results. Methods: The study included 112 consecutive patients who underwent an elective cholecystectomy between January 1997 and December 2000. The procedure was changed in eight ways: the American position, open laparoscopy, reusable trocars, reusable instruments, bipolar coagulation of the cystic artery, intracorporeal ligature of the cystic duct, no use of suction lavage apparatus, and use of a surgical glove as a bag to extract the gallbladder. Complete compliance with the procedure, whether any abnormal operative events or complications occurred, the duration of hospitalization, and the material and labour costs of the procedure were recorded. Results: There were no abnormal operative events. Only two patients suffered from postoperative complications. The mean duration of hospitalization was 55.8 h. Fifteen patients (13.4 per cent) were not hospitalized overnight. The operating costs fell from 560 euros before the study to 330 euros in 2000. Conclusion: By applying simple measures, it is possible to decrease the operating room cost of laparoscopic cholecystectomy whilst maintaining good results. Such measures should be applied to other laparoscopic procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:1602 / 1607
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   A cost-minimization analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy [J].
Berggren, U ;
Zethraeus, N ;
Arvidsson, D ;
Haglund, U ;
Jonsson, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 172 (04) :305-310
[2]   Open versus closed establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery [J].
Bonjer, HJ ;
Hazebroek, EJ ;
Kazemier, G ;
Giuffrida, MC ;
Meijer, WS ;
Lange, JF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 84 (05) :599-602
[3]   Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A good buy? A cost comparison with small-incision (mini) cholecystectomy [J].
Calvert, NW ;
Troy, GP ;
Johnson, AG .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 166 (10) :782-786
[4]  
Croce E, 2000, JSLS, V4, P17
[5]   A cost comparison of disposable vs reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Demoulin, L ;
Kesteloot, K ;
Penninckx, F .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1996, 10 (05) :520-525
[6]  
DesCoteaux JG, 1998, CAN J SURG, V41, P136
[7]  
FABIANI P, 1993, PRESSE MED, V22, P535
[8]   EVALUATION OF THE COST OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
FULLARTON, GM ;
DARLING, K ;
WILLIAMS, J ;
MACMILLAN, R ;
BELL, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (01) :124-126
[9]   Visual identification of the cystic duct-CBD junction during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (visual cholangiography) - An additional step for prevention of CBD injuries [J].
Katkhouda, N ;
Mavor, E ;
Mason, RJ .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2000, 14 (01) :88-89
[10]   A safe and simple method for routine open access in laparoscopic procedures [J].
Lafullarde, T ;
Van Hee, R ;
Gys, T .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1999, 13 (08) :769-772