Adaptive Cognitive Testing in Cerebrovascular Disease and Vascular Dementia

被引:12
作者
Wouters, Hans [1 ]
de Koning, Inge [4 ]
Zwinderman, Aeilko H. [1 ]
van Gool, Willem A. [2 ]
Schmand, Ben [2 ,3 ]
Buiter, Maarten [1 ]
Lindeboom, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol Biostat & Bioinformat, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC, Dept Neurol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Dementia; vascular; Models; logistic; Curve; ROC; MENTAL-STATE-EXAMINATION; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; SCREENING INSTRUMENT; POSTSTROKE DEMENTIA; CAMCOG; IMPAIRMENT; DIAGNOSIS; DECLINE;
D O I
10.1159/000250593
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
030301 [社会学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background/Aims: To examine whether brevity can be combined with precision in measuring global cognitive ability in patients with cerebrovascular disease (CVD) or vascular dementia (VaD). Longer tests (e. g. the CAMCOG) are precise but inefficient, whereas brief tests (e. g. the MMSE) are efficient but imprecise. Methods: A simulated computerized adaptive testing (CAT) algorithm using existing CAMCOG data from 284 patients with CVD of whom 55 were diagnosed with VaD. CAT was used to estimate each individual patient's total score on a large precise test (the CAMCOG). CAT repeatedly selected only items of appropriate difficulty, depending on whether the previous item was (in) correctly responded to. CAT estimates were compared with total scores on the whole CAMCOG. Results: Even though there was an average test reduction of more than 40%, CAT estimates were in very high agreement with the whole test results (intraclass correlation >0.97) and had similar accuracy for the diagnosis of dementia (area under the curve = 0.94). Conclusion: CAT combines efficiency with precision in the measurement of global cognitive ability in CVD patients. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 492
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
A short screening instrument for poststroke dementia - The R-CAMCOG [J].
de Koning, I ;
Dippel, DWJ ;
van Kooten, F ;
Koudstaal, PJ .
STROKE, 2000, 31 (07) :1502-1508
[2]
The CAMCOG: A useful screening instrument for dementia in stroke patients [J].
de Koning, I ;
van Kooten, F ;
Dippel, DWJ ;
van Harskamp, F ;
Grobbee, DE ;
Kluft, C ;
Koudstaal, PJ .
STROKE, 1998, 29 (10) :2080-2086
[3]
Diagnostic value of the Rotterdam-CAMCOG in post-stroke dementia [J].
de Koning, I ;
van Kooten, F ;
Koudstaal, PJ ;
Dippel, DWJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 76 (02) :263-265
[4]
SCORING NONRESPONSE ON THE MINI-MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION [J].
FILLENBAUM, GG ;
GEORGE, LK ;
BLAZER, DG .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1988, 18 (04) :1021-1025
[5]
Development of a computer-adaptive test for depression (D-CAT) [J].
Fliege, H ;
Becker, J ;
Walter, OB ;
Bjorner, JB ;
Klapp, BF ;
Rose, M .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 14 (10) :2277-2291
[6]
FOLSTEIN MF, 1975, J PSYCHIATR RES, V12, P198
[7]
Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank [J].
Haley, Stephen M. ;
Ni, Pengsheng ;
Hambleton, Ronald K. ;
Slavin, Mary D. ;
Jette, Alan M. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (11) :1174-1182
[8]
Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function [J].
Hart, Dennis L. ;
Mioduski, Jerome E. ;
Werneke, Mark W. ;
Stratford, Paul W. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (09) :947-956
[9]
Predictive value of 6-month decline in ADAS-cog for survival without severe Alzheimer's disease [J].
Helmer, Catherine ;
Andrieu, Sandrine ;
Peres, Karine ;
Orgogozo, Jean-Marc ;
Vellas, Bruno ;
Dartigues, Jean-Francois .
DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 2007, 23 (03) :168-174
[10]
CAMCOG - A CONCISE NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST TO ASSIST DEMENTIA DIAGNOSIS - SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC DETERMINANTS IN AN ELDERLY POPULATION-SAMPLE [J].
HUPPERT, FA ;
BRAYNE, C ;
GILL, C ;
PAYKEL, ES ;
BEARDSALL, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 34 :529-541