Geometric constraints and spatial pattern of species richness: critique of range-based null models

被引:43
作者
Laurie, H [1 ]
Silander, JA
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, Dept Math & Appl Math, ZA-7701 Rondebosch, South Africa
[2] Univ Cape Town, Dept Bot, Inst Plant Conservat, ZA-7701 Rondebosch, South Africa
[3] Univ Connecticut, Dept Ecol, Storrs, CT 06268 USA
关键词
biogeography; edge effects; mid-domain effect; null models; Proteaceae; spatial pattern; species richness;
D O I
10.1046/j.1472-4642.2002.00160.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Does the shape of a biogeographical region influence its spatial patterns of species richness? A complete answer must include careful distinction between the distribution of a species, which is a complex geometric object, and the range of a species, which is relatively simple, especially when reduced to one dimension. We consider range-based models of species richness, in particular range overlap counts in one dimension, for which we give a unified mathematical treatment via the joint probability P(m,l) of midpoints and lengths of ranges. We discuss a number of difficulties, in practice and in principle, using range-based models, and show that the so-called mid-domain effect, a proposed null model for the effect of geometric constraint, is qualitatively a property of all biologically realistic models based on range overlap counts. As such, range-based models provide little insight into understanding or explaining biogeographical patterns in species richness. We characterize the quantitative null model for range overlap counts in one dimension, for which we give a simple and direct field test based on P(m,l). We apply this test to a large clade in a complete bioregion (the Proteaceae of the Cape Floristic Region): geometric constraint does not explain the spatial pattern in this case. We show that any geometric constraint on species richness, including range overlap counts, must act via edge effects. Thus, to understand biogeographical patterns, an understanding of the effects and consequences of edges is fundamental.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 364
页数:14
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   MODEL COMPARISONS AND R2 [J].
ANDERSONSPRECHER, R .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1994, 48 (02) :113-117
[2]  
Colwell R.K., 1984, P344
[3]   The mid-domain effect: geometric constraints on the geography of species richness [J].
Colwell, RK ;
Lees, DC .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2000, 15 (02) :70-76
[4]   NONBIOLOGICAL GRADIENTS IN SPECIES RICHNESS AND A SPURIOUS RAPOPORT EFFECT [J].
COLWELL, RK ;
HURTT, GC .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1994, 144 (04) :570-595
[5]  
COLWELL RK, 2001, RANGEMODEL 3 1
[6]   Geographical patterns of old and young species in African forest biota: The significance of specific montane areas as evolutionary centres [J].
Fjeldsa, J ;
Lovett, JC .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 1997, 6 (03) :325-346
[7]  
Goldblatt P., 2000, CAPE PLANTS CONSPECT
[8]   Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness [J].
Gotelli, NJ ;
Colwell, RK .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2001, 4 (04) :379-391
[9]  
Gotelli NJ, 1996, NULL MODELS ECOLOGY, DOI DOI 10.2307/2265928
[10]  
Hubbell Stephen P., 2001, V32, pi