The elephant in the living room: or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence

被引：179

作者：

Denzin, Norman K. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Illinois, Inst Commun Res, Urbana, IL 61801 USA

来源：

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH | 2009年 / 9卷 / 02期

关键词：

ethics; evidence; politics; standards; policy; praxis; SCIENTIFICALLY BASED RESEARCH; QUALITATIVE INQUIRY; DANGEROUS DISCOURSES; EDUCATION; EPISTEMOLOGY;

D O I：

10.1177/1468794108098034

中图分类号：

C [社会科学总论];

学科分类号：

03 ; 0303 ;

摘要：

The controversies surrounding the evidence-based research movement are reviewed from a critical pedagogy framework. Standards for assessing quality are forms of interpretive practice that enact a politics of evidence and truth. Moral and ethical criteria for judging qualitative research are reviewed.

引用

页码：139 / 160

页数：22

共 89 条

[1]

[Anonymous], REP HUM SUBJ AC FREE

[2]

[Anonymous], 2005, Advancing scientific research in education

[3]

[Anonymous], 2002, SCI RES ED

[4]

[Anonymous], STAND REP EMP SOC SC

[5]

[Anonymous], WHAT WORKS CLEARINGH

[6]

[Anonymous], COCHRANE QUALITATIVE

[7] In the roiling smoke: qualitative inquiry and contested fields [J].

Atkinson, Paul ;

Delamont, Sara .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE STUDIES IN EDUCATION, 2006, 19 (06) :747-755

[8]

BISHOP R, 1998, INT J QUAL STUD EDUC, V2, P199

[9]

Bourdieu Pierre., 1998, PRACTICAL REASON

[10]

Briggs J., 2006, Cochrane qualitative research methods group

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 →