Difference thresholds for automobile seat vibration

被引:42
作者
Mansfield, NJ [1 ]
Griffin, MJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Inst Sound & Vibrat Res, Human Factors Res Unit, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
关键词
whole-body vibration; comfort; perception;
D O I
10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00054-X
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Reductions in vehicle vibration that may contribute to improvements in overall vehicle ride could individually be too small to be detected by drivers or passengers. This study investigated the 'difference threshold' (the difference in magnitude between two stimuli which is just sufficient for their difference to be detected) required for a change in vehicle ride to be perceived and whether this was consistent with Weber's Law. Ten male and 10 female subjects sat in a car seat and were exposed to four different reproductions of the vertical vibration recorded on the seat of a car. Three of the stimuli had the same waveform recorded while the car traversed a tarmac surface. This waveform was reproduced using three different magnitudes of vibration at the seat: 0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 m s(-2) r.m.s. (W-b weighted). The other stimulus was recorded with the car traversing a 'pave' surface that gave a different waveform that was reproduced at a magnitude of 0.4 m s(-2) r.m.s. (W-b weighted). There were significant differences in the absolute difference thresholds measured using the same waveform at the three different magnitudes. When the difference thresholds were expressed in relative terms (the proportion by which two stimuli must differ in magnitude to be discriminated), the relative difference thresholds were approximately 13%, and independent of both the vibration magnitude and the vibration waveform. The results are therefore consistent with Weber's Law. No consistent differences were observed between the responses of male and female subjects. (C) 2000 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 261
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
*BRIT STAND I, 1987, 6841 BS BRIT STAND I
[2]  
*BRIT STAND I, 1989, 7085 BS BRIT STAND I
[3]   VIBROTACTILE INTENSITY DISCRIMINATION MEASURED BY 3 METHODS [J].
GESCHEIDER, GA ;
BOLANOWSKI, SJ ;
VERRILLO, RT ;
ARPAJIAN, DJ ;
RYAN, TF .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1990, 87 (01) :330-338
[4]  
*INT ORG STAND, 1997, 26311 ISO INT ORG ST
[5]  
*INT ORG STAND, 1992, 103261 ISO INT ORG S
[6]  
MORIOKA M, 1999, J ACOUST SOC AM, V106, P1
[7]   WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION PERCEPTION THRESHOLDS [J].
PARSONS, KC ;
GRIFFIN, MJ .
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1988, 121 (02) :237-258
[8]  
PIELEMEIER WJ, 1997, 32 UK GROUP M HUM RE
[9]  
*SAE, 1985, J826 SAE
[10]   SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION [J].
WETHERILL, GB ;
LEVITT, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1965, 18 (01) :1-10