Osseointegrated implants with pendulum springs for maxillary molar distalization:: A cephalometric study

被引:39
作者
Oencag, Goekhan [1 ]
Seckin, Oezlem
Dincer, Banu
Arikan, Fatih
机构
[1] Univ Ege, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
[2] Univ Ege, Dept Periodont, Fac Dent, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.034
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
Introduction: Maxillary molar distalization is a common treatment approach for patients with Class II malocclusions who do not require extractions. Despite the many advantages of pendulum appliances, the maxillary incisors and premolars tend to shift mesially as the maxillary molars move distally. The purpose of this study was to investigate anchorage loss in patients treated with palatal osseointegrated implants combined with pendulum springs. Methods: Pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalometric films of 30 consecutively treated patients were examined. One group (n = 15) had been treated with conventional pendulum appliances, and the other group (n = 15) was treated with palatal osseointegrated implants combined with pendulum springs. Results: In the pendulum group, significant distal tipping of the maxillary first molars and mesial tipping of the maxillary premolars were noted. Distalization of the maxillary first molars, mesialization of the maxillary first premolars, and proclination of the maxillary left central incisor were significant in the linear measurements. In the implant group, the distal tipping of the maxillary first molars and first premolars and the increases in SNGoGn, FMA, Na Me, and Na ANS were significant. Intergroup comparisons showed that changes in the maxillary first premolars, maxillary central incisors, and vertical measurements were significant. Conclusions: The use of palatal osseointegrated implants is reliable and provides absolute anchorage.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 26
页数:11
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]
Reactions of peri-implant tissues to continuous loading of osseointegrated implants [J].
Akin-Nergiz, N ;
Nergiz, I ;
Schulz, A ;
Arpak, N ;
Niedermeier, W .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1998, 114 (03) :292-298
[2]
[Anonymous], 1992, INF ORTHOD KIEFEROR
[3]
CONTROLLING MAGNITUDE, DIRECTION, AND DURATION OF EXTRAORAL FORCE [J].
ARMSTRONG, MM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1971, 59 (03) :217-+
[4]
Bennett RK, 1994, CLIN IMPRESSIONS, V3, P14
[5]
Alternative to the median region of the palate for placement of an orthodontic implant [J].
Bernhart, T ;
Vollgruber, A ;
Gahleitner, A ;
Dörtbudak, O ;
Haas, R .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2000, 11 (06) :595-601
[6]
A NEW DEVICE FOR ABSOLUTE ANCHORAGE FOR ORTHODONTICS [J].
BLOCK, MS ;
HOFFMAN, DR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1995, 107 (03) :251-258
[7]
BONDEMARK L, 1994, ANGLE ORTHOD, V64, P189
[8]
Bondemark L, 1992, Eur J Orthod, V14, P264
[9]
A comparative analysis of distal maxillary molar movement produced by a new lingual intra-arch Ni-Ti coil appliance and a magnetic appliance [J].
Bondemark, L .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2000, 22 (06) :683-695
[10]
Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: A cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances [J].
Burkhardt, DR ;
McNamara, JA ;
Baccetti, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2003, 123 (02) :108-116