Bureaucracy and organizational performance: Causality arguments about public schools

被引:60
作者
Meier, KJ [1 ]
Polinard, JL
Wrinkle, RD
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Univ Texas Pan Amer, Edinburg, TX 78539 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2669266
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
One key policy dispute in the school choice debate concerns whether the education bureaucracy is a cause or a consequence of poor performance. This dispute is striking because both sides accept the same neo-institutionalist organization theory. This article uses a large panel of school districts to address the dispute. The evidence suggests that poor performance results in a growing bureaucracy not vice versa. Further evidence then shows that the growth in bureaucracy is associated in an increase in teachers and smaller class sizes; in short, bureaucracy increases as schools take actions that are linked to improved performance.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 602
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SPINNING WHEELS
[2]  
BECK N, 1995, AM POLIT SCI REV, V89, P634, DOI 10.2307/2082979
[3]  
Beck Nathaniel, 1996, POLIT ANAL, V6, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1093/PAN/6.1.1, 10.1093/pan/6.1.1]
[4]  
BOHTE J, 2000, IN PRESS PUBLIC ADM
[5]  
Brown B.W., 1992, Economics of Education Review, V11, P287
[6]  
Burtless G.T., 1996, DOES MONEY MATTER EF
[7]  
Chubb J., 1990, POLITICS MARKETS AME
[8]   POLITICS, MARKETS, AND THE ORGANIZATION OF SCHOOLS [J].
CHUBB, JE ;
MOE, TM .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1988, 82 (04) :1065-1087
[9]  
DEHAAN RF, 1963, ACCELERATED LEARNING
[10]  
Downs Anthony., 1967, INSIDE BUREAUCRACY