Pain and Disability Determine Treatment Modality for Older Patients With Adult Scoliosis, While Deformity Guides Treatment for Younger Patients

被引:152
作者
Bess, Shay [1 ]
Boachie-Adjei, Oheneba [2 ]
Burton, Doug [3 ]
Cunningham, Matthew [2 ]
Shaffrey, Chris [4 ]
Shelokov, Alexis
Hostin, Richard [5 ]
Schwab, Frank [6 ]
Wood, Kirkham [7 ]
Akbarnia, Behrooz [8 ]
机构
[1] Rocky Mt Hosp Children, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Denver, CO 80218 USA
[2] Hosp Special Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Kansas City, KS 66103 USA
[4] Univ Virginia, Charlottesville, VA USA
[5] Baylor Scoliosis Ctr, Plano, TX USA
[6] NYU, Hosp Joint Dis, New York, NY USA
[7] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[8] San Diego Ctr Spinal Disorders, La Jolla, CA USA
关键词
adult scoliosis; operative treatment; nonoperative treatment; SPINAL DEFORMITY; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; COMPLICATIONS; SURGERY; OUTCOMES; INSTRUMENTATION; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b05146
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Study Design. Multi-center, retrospective review. Objective. Identify age associated clinical and radiographic features correlating with AS treatment. Summary of Background Data. Little information exists about factors determining treatment for adult scoliosis (AS). Existing studies have not evaluated age stratified differences. Methods. Multicenter, retrospective review of 290 patients treated for AS. Patients divided into operative (OP) or nonoperative (NON), and age stratified into 3 groups (G1 = < 50 years, G2 = 50-65 years, G3 = >65 years). Demographic and spinopelvic radiographic parameters evaluated. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) measures included SRS-22, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog pain scale. Results. Treatment groups (OP, n = 137; NON, n = 153) demonstrated similar age (OP = 52.7 years; NON = 55.5 years; P > 0.05) and cormorbidities. OP had larger thoracic curves than NON (OP = 51 degrees, NON = 45 degrees; P < 0.05). OP had worse HRQL scores than NON (SRS = 2.95 vs. 3.12, P < 0.05; ODI = 33.4 vs. 28.7, P < 0.05; visual analog pain scale = 6.9 vs. 5.6, P < 0.05, respectively). Age stratification of OP demonstrated larger curves in G1 and G2 versus G3, progressively worsening sagittal imbalance in older age groups, and worse HRQL scores in G3 versus G1 and G2. Age stratification of NON demonstrated worsening sagittal imbalance with age, however, other radiographic values and HRQL scores were similar between all NON age groups. Treatment stratification of age groups demonstrated G1-OP had greater deformity than G1-NON (mean thoracic curve: G1-OP = 53 degrees, G1-NON = 43 degrees; P < 0.05) but similar HRQL values. Whereas G2 and G3-OP had similar radiographic coronal and sagittal values as G2 and G3-NON, but worse HRQL scores. Conclusion. Counter to previous reports, age, cormorbidities, and sagittal balance did not influence treatment modality for AS. Operative treatment for younger patients was driven by increased coronal plane deformity. Conversely, pain and disability mandated treatment for olderpatients, independent of radiographic measures. These findings suggest that AS patients do not become uniformly disabled with age, and that disability can not be solely predicted by radiographic findings. These data should be considered when considering treatment for AS.
引用
收藏
页码:2186 / 2190
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
Medical complications of surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity and how to avoid them [J].
Baron, Eli M. ;
Albert, Todd J. .
SPINE, 2006, 31 (19) :S106-S118
[2]
Studies in the modified scoliosis research society outcomes instrument in adults: Validation, reliability, and discriminatory capacity [J].
Berven, S ;
Deviren, V ;
Demir-Deviren, S ;
Hu, SS ;
Bradford, DS .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (18) :2164-2169
[3]
Adult scoliosis: Surgical indications, operative management, complications, and outcomes [J].
Bradford, DS ;
Tay, BKB ;
Hu, SS .
SPINE, 1999, 24 (24) :2617-2629
[4]
Is the SRS-22 instrument responsive to change in adult scoliosis patients having primary spinal deformity surgery? [J].
Bridwell, Keith H. ;
Berven, Sigurd ;
Glassman, Steven ;
Hamill, Christopher ;
Horton, William C., III ;
Lenke, Lawrence G. ;
Schwab, Frank ;
Baldus, Christine ;
Shainline, Michael .
SPINE, 2007, 32 (20) :2220-2225
[5]
The problems and limitations of applying evidence-based medicine to primary surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity [J].
Bridwell, Keith H. ;
Berven, Sigurd ;
Edwards, Charles ;
Glassman, Steven ;
Hamill, Christopher ;
Schwab, Frank .
SPINE, 2007, 32 (19) :S135-S139
[6]
Complications in posterior fusion and instrumentation for degenerative lumbar scoliosis [J].
Cho, Kyu-Jung ;
Suk, Se-Il ;
Park, Seung-Rim ;
Kim, Jin-Hyok ;
Kim, Sung-Soo ;
Choi, Won-Kee ;
Lee, Kang-Yoon ;
Lee, Seung-Ryol .
SPINE, 2007, 32 (20) :2232-2237
[7]
Adult spinal deformity surgery - Complications and outcomes in patients over age 60 [J].
Daubs, Michael D. ;
Lenke, Lawrence G. ;
Cheh, Gene ;
Stobbs, Georgia ;
Bridwell, Keith H. .
SPINE, 2007, 32 (20) :2238-2244
[8]
RESULTS OF OPERATIVE TREATMENT OF IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS IN ADULTS [J].
DICKSON, JH ;
MIRKOVIC, S ;
NOBLE, PC ;
NALTY, T ;
ERWIN, WD .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1995, 77A (04) :513-523
[9]
Eck K R, 2001, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), V26, pE182, DOI 10.1097/00007632-200105010-00012
[10]
FOWLES JV, 1978, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P212