Explaining the power-law degree distribution in a social commerce network

被引:105
作者
Stephen, Andrew T. [1 ]
Toubia, Olivier [2 ]
机构
[1] INSEAD, F-77305 Fontainebleau, France
[2] Columbia Univ, Grad Sch Business, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
Network evolution; Preferential attachment; Clustering; Reciprocity; Empirical modeling; Social commerce; PREFERENTIAL ATTACHMENT; MODELS; TRANSITIVITY; WEAK;
D O I
10.1016/j.socnet.2009.07.002
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
070906 [古生物学及地层学(含古人类学)];
摘要
Social commerce is an emerging trend in which online shops create referral hyperlinks to other shops in the same online marketplace. We study the evolution of a social commerce network in a large online marketplace. Our dataset starts before the birth of the network (at which points shops were not linked to each other) and includes the birth of the network. The network under study exhibits a typical power-law degree distribution. We empirically compare a set of edge formation mechanisms (including preferential attachment and triadic closure) that may explain the emergence of this property. Our results suggest that the evolution of the network and the emergence of its power-law degree distribution are better explained by a network evolution mechanism that relies on vertex attributes that are not based on the structure of the network. Specifically, Our analysis suggests that the power-law degree distribution emerges because shops prefer to connect to shops with more diverse assortments, and assortment diversity follows a power-law distribution. Shops with more diverse assortments are more attractive to link to because they are more likely to bring traffic from consumers browsing the WWW. Therefore, our results also imply that social commerce networks should not be studied in isolation, but rather in the context of the broader network in which they are embedded (the WWW). (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 270
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2006, LONG TAIL WHY FUTURE
[2]
[Anonymous], SOCIOLOGICAL METHODO
[3]
Zipf distribution of US firm sizes [J].
Axtell, RL .
SCIENCE, 2001, 293 (5536) :1818-1820
[4]
Emergence of scaling in random networks [J].
Barabási, AL ;
Albert, R .
SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5439) :509-512
[5]
Clauset A., POWER LAW D IN PRESS
[7]
THE FOCUSED ORGANIZATION OF SOCIAL TIES [J].
FELD, SL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1981, 86 (05) :1015-1035
[8]
PATTERNS OF SOCIOMETRIC CHOICES - TRANSITIVITY RECONSIDERED [J].
FELD, SL ;
ELMORE, R .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 1982, 45 (02) :77-85
[9]
THE STRENGTH OF WEAK TIES [J].
GRANOVETTER, MS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1973, 78 (06) :1360-1380
[10]
Likelihood-based inference for stochastic models of sexual network formation [J].
Handcock, MS ;
Jones, JH .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 2004, 65 (04) :413-422