Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection

被引:291
作者
Schrag, D
Panageas, KS
Riedel, E
Cramer, LD
Guillem, JG
Bach, PB
Begg, CB
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Hlth Outcomes Res Grp, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000658-200211000-00008
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To compare surgeon and hospital procedure volume as predictors of outcomes for patients with rectal cancer. Summary Background Data Although a "volume-outcome" relationship exists for several major cancer operations, the impact of procedure volume on outcomes following rectal cancer surgery remains uncertain, and it has not been determined whether hospital or surgeon volume is a more important predictor of outcomes. Methods A retrospective population-based cohort study utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database identified 2,815 rectal cancer patients aged 65 and older who had surgery for a primary tumor diagnosed in 1992-1996 in a SEER area. Hospital- and surgeon-specific procedure volume was ascertained based on the number of claims submitted over the 5-year study period. Outcome measures were mortality at 30 days and 2 years, overall survival, and the rate of abdominoperineal resections. Age, sex, race, comorbid illness, cancer stage, and socioeconomic status were used to adjust for differences in case mix. Results Neither hospital- nor surgeon-specific procedure volume was significantly associated with 30-day postoperative mortality or rates of rectal sphincter-sparing operations. Although an association between hospital volume and mortality at 2 years was evident, this finding was no longer significant once surgeon-specific volume was controlled for. In contrast, surgeon-specific volume was associated with 2-year mortality and remained an important predictor even after adjustment for hospital volume. Surgeon volume was also better than hospital procedure volume at predicting long-term survival. Conclusions Surgeon-specific experience as measured by procedure volume can have a significant impact on survival for patients with rectal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 592
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer [J].
Bach, PB ;
Cramer, LD ;
Schrag, D ;
Downey, RJ ;
Gelfand, SE ;
Begg, CB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (03) :181-188
[2]   Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery [J].
Begg, CB ;
Cramer, LD ;
Hoskins, WJ ;
Brennan, MF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (20) :1747-1751
[3]  
Bjerkeset T, 1996, EUR J SURG, V162, P643
[4]  
BOARD NCP, 2001, INTERPRETING VOLUME
[5]   APPROXIMATE INFERENCE IN GENERALIZED LINEAR MIXED MODELS [J].
BRESLOW, NE ;
CLAYTON, DG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 88 (421) :9-25
[6]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[7]   Changing strategy for rectal cancer is associated with improved outcome [J].
Dahlberg, M ;
Glimelius, B ;
Påhlman, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 86 (03) :379-384
[8]   The effect of the volume of procedures at transplantation centers on mortality after liver transplantation. [J].
Edwards, EB ;
Roberts, JP ;
McBride, MA ;
Schulak, JA ;
Hunsicker, LG .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (27) :2049-2053
[9]  
Guillem J G, 2000, Adv Surg, V34, P43
[10]   Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection [J].
Harmon, JW ;
Tang, DG ;
Gordon, TA ;
Bowman, HM ;
Choti, MA ;
Kaufman, HS ;
Bender, JS ;
Duncan, MD ;
Magnuson, TH ;
Lillemoe, KD ;
Cameron, JL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 230 (03) :404-411