Validation of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified in Subjects with Normal Cognition, Mild Cognitive Impairment, or Dementia

被引:249
作者
Knopman, David S. [1 ,2 ]
Roberts, Rosebud O. [2 ,3 ]
Geda, Yonas E. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Pankratz, V. Shane [2 ,5 ]
Christianson, Teresa J. H. [2 ,5 ]
Petersen, Ronald C. [1 ,2 ]
Rocca, Walter A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurol, Coll Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Alzheimers Dis Res Ctr, Coll Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Div Epidemiol, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Coll Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Psychiat & Psychol, Coll Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Div Biomed Stat & Informat, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Coll Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
Dementia; Mild cognitive impairment; Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified; MENTAL STATUS; TICS-M; RISK;
D O I
10.1159/000255464
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The telephone assessment of cognitive functions may reduce the cost and burden of epidemiological studies. Methods: We validated the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified (TICS-m) using an extensive in-person assessment as the standard for comparison. Clinical diagnoses of normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or dementia were established by consensus of physician, nurse, and neuropsychological assessments. Results: The extensive in-person assessment classified 83 persons with normal cognition, 42 persons with MCI, and 42 persons with dementia. There was considerable overlap in TICS-m scores among the three groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves identified <= 31 as the optimal cutoff score to separate subjects with MCI from subjects with normal cognition (sensitivity = 71.4%; subjects with dementia excluded), and <= 27 to separate subjects with dementia from subjects with MCI (sensitivity = 69.0%; subjects with normal cognition excluded). The TICS-m performed well when subjects with MCI were pooled either with subjects with dementia (sensitivity = 83.3%) or with subjects with normal cognition (sensitivity = 83.3%). Conclusions: Although the TICS-m performed well when using a dichotomous classification of cognitive status, it performed only fairly in separating MCI from either normal cognition or dementia. The TICS-m should not be used as a free-standing tool to identify subjects with MCI, and it should be used with caution as a tool to detect dementia. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 42
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Validation of the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-m) in Hebrew [J].
Beeri, MS ;
Werner, P ;
Davidson, M ;
Schmidler, J ;
Silverman, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 18 (05) :381-386
[2]  
Brandt J., 1988, NEUROPSY NEUROPSY BE, V1, P111, DOI DOI 10.1037/T28542-000
[3]   Validation of multi-stage telephone-based identification of cognitive impairment and dementia [J].
Crooks, VC ;
Clark, L ;
Petitti, DB ;
Chui, H ;
Chiu, V .
BMC NEUROLOGY, 2005, 5 (1)
[4]   Utility of TICS-M for the assessment of cognitive function in older adults [J].
de Jager, CA ;
Budge, MM ;
Clarke, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 18 (04) :318-324
[5]   MINI-MENTAL STATE - PRACTICAL METHOD FOR GRADING COGNITIVE STATE OF PATIENTS FOR CLINICIAN [J].
FOLSTEIN, MF ;
FOLSTEIN, SE ;
MCHUGH, PR .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (03) :189-198
[6]   ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE IN THE NAS-NRC REGISTRY OF AGING TWIN VETERANS .4. PERFORMANCE-CHARACTERISTICS OF A 2-STAGE TELEPHONE SCREENING-PROCEDURE FOR ALZHEIMERS DEMENTIA [J].
GALLO, JJ ;
BREITNER, JCS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1995, 25 (06) :1211-1219
[7]   A cost effective method of identifying and recruiting persons over 80 free of dementia or mild cognitive impairment [J].
Graff-Radford, NR ;
Ferman, TJ ;
Lucas, JA ;
Johnson, HK ;
Patfitt, FC ;
Heckman, MG ;
Todd, M ;
Sadowsky, C ;
Epstein, DE ;
Crook, JE .
ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS, 2006, 20 (02) :101-104
[8]  
Ivnik R.J., 1992, Clinical Neuropsychologist, V6, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/13854049208401877
[9]  
Kaplan E., 1982, BOSTON NAMING TEST
[10]  
Knopman DS, 2000, NEUROPSY NEUROPSY BE, V13, P286