A commercial sunscreen's protection against ultraviolet radiation-induced immunosuppression is more than 50% lower than protection against sunburn in humans

被引:53
作者
Kelly, DA
Seed, PT
Young, AR
Walker, SL
机构
[1] Univ London Kings Coll, St Thomas Hosp, Dept Environm Dermatol,Photobiol Unit, Div Skin Sci,St Johns Inst Dermatol, London SE1 7EH, England
[2] Univ London Kings Coll, St Thomas Hosp, Guys Kings & St Thomas Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, London SE1 7EH, England
关键词
contact hypersensitivity; immunosuppression; sunscreen; ultraviolet A;
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12005.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Ultraviolet radiation (280-400 nm)-induced suppression of cutaneous cell-mediated immunity plays an important part in the development of skin cancer. Sunscreens are widely advocated to protect against skin cancer but if they offer insufficient protection against immunosuppression they may inadvertently increase skin cancer risk. This human study evaluated immunoprotection afforded by a commercial sunscreen preparation (labeled sun protection factor 15) offering primarily ultraviolet B (280-320 nm) protection. Indirectly, it also investigated whether ultraviolet A (320-400 nm) plays a part in ultraviolet radiation-induced immunosuppression. Healthy white-skinned volunteers were used (n=119). Ultraviolet radiation exposures were on previously unexposed buttock skin with an ultraviolet radiation source that complied with European recommendations for sunscreen testing. Ultraviolet radiation dose-response curves for sunburn/erythema and suppression of the contact hypersensitivity response were generated either with or without sunscreen in vivo and protection factors were derived for both end-points. The ultraviolet radiation wavelengths transmitted by the sunscreen were determined in vitro and showed that the sunscreen was primarily an ultraviolet B absorber, with relatively poor absorption in the ultraviolet A region. The sun-screen protected against both erythema and immunosuppression but protection against immunosuppression (IPF=4.9, 95% confidence interval: 2.3-10.6) was less than half that for erythema (Ery-PFg=14.2, 95% confidence interval: 10.2-19.8). Failure of the sunscreen to afford comparable protection against both end-points was probably due to immunosuppression by ultraviolet A, a part of the solar spectrum that does not readily cause sunburn. The sunscreen protected against both end-points, which supports the use of sunscreens to reduce immunosuppression but protection against immunosuppression may be improved if sunscreens are formulated to offer equivalent protection against ultraviolet B and ultraviolet A.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Sunscreen use and duration of sun exposure:: a double-blind, randomized trial [J].
Autier, P ;
Doré, JF ;
Négrier, S ;
Liénard, D ;
Panizzon, R ;
Lejeune, FJ ;
Guggisberg, D ;
Eggermont, AMM .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1999, 91 (15) :1304-1309
[2]  
BESTAK R, 1995, J INVEST DERMATOL, V105, P345, DOI 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12320580
[3]   ULTRAVIOLET-RADIATION DECREASES THE GRANULOMATOUS RESPONSE TO LEPROMIN IN HUMANS [J].
CESTARI, TF ;
KRIPKE, ML ;
BAPTISTA, PL ;
BAKOS, L ;
BUCANA, CD .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 1995, 105 (01) :8-13
[4]  
*COLIPA, 1994, COLIPA SUN PROT FACT
[5]   Broad-spectrum sunscreens provide greater protection against ultraviolet-radiation-induced suppression of contact hypersensitivity to a recall antigen in humans [J].
Damian, DL ;
Halliday, GM ;
Barnetson, RS .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 1997, 109 (02) :146-151
[6]   Low-dose UVA and UVB have different time courses for suppression of contact hypersensitivity to a recall antigen in humans [J].
Damian, DL ;
Barnetson, RS ;
Halliday, GM .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 1999, 112 (06) :939-944
[7]  
DEFABO EC, 1983, J EXP MED, V157, P84
[8]  
DIFFEY BL, 1989, J SOC COSMET CHEM, V40, P127
[9]  
DONAWHO CK, 1991, CANCER RES, V51, P4176
[10]   ACTION SPECTRUM STUDIES FOR INDUCTION OF IMMUNOLOGICAL-UNRESPONSIVENESS TO DINITROFLUOROBENZENE FOLLOWING INVIVO LOW-DOSE ULTRAVIOLET-RADIATION [J].
ELMETS, CA ;
LEVINE, MJ ;
BICKERS, DR .
PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY, 1985, 42 (04) :391-397