Backscattering behavior and simulation comparison over bare soils using SIR-C/X-SAR and ERASME 1994 data over Orgeval

被引:92
作者
Zribi, M
Taconet, O
LeHegaratMascle, S
VidalMadjar, D
Emblanch, C
Loumagne, C
Normand, M
机构
[1] CNRS,CETP,VELIZY VILLACOUBL,FRANCE
[2] CEMAGREFF,ANTONY HYDROL,ANTONY,FRANCE
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00158-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
During April 1994, the three-frequency radar system flew on the Space Shuttle Endeavour, known as SIR-C/X-SAR mission (Shuttle Imaging Radar C/X-Synthetic Aperture Radar). Over the Orgeval watershed (France), the ground condition stayed very wet throughout the 5-day SAR mission. The SAR imagery allows a data collection over a range of roughness conditions on bare soils. Three classes were identified: very smooth sowings with crusted top layer, cloddy surfaces, and different ploughed fields for future crops. To complement the Shuttle Radar data (three frequencies, L, C, X, incidence range from 44 degrees to 57 degrees), the helicopter-borne scatterometer ERASME (C- and X-bands, copolarized configurations) were used. Merging of the two databases was possible. As a result, incidence angles ranging from 25 degrees to 50 degrees are available in C- and X-bands for the copolarized cross sections. Then the major objective of the article is, over this available surface backscattering models to natural surfaces, the theoretical integral equation model (IEM) of Fung et al. (1992) and the empirical model of Oh et al. (1994). It shows adequacies and limits. The IEM model reproduces well radar scatter over smooth surfaces, but fails over rough surfaces, predicting a flatter response with incidence angle than the observed signals in C- and X-bands. Difference in backscatter response due to direction angles (perpendicular and parallel to the row direction) is difficult to reproduce over smooth surfaces by this model integrating anisotropic surface but may be due to the unadequacy of the surface representation. The Oh algorithm agrees well with the backscatter response over rough surfaces at medium incidence angle, but fails with a systematic underestimation over smooth conditions. As a conclusion, further developments are necessary on derivation of theoretical solutions over rough surfaces and on validation of semiempirical algorithms over data sets of various training sources (radar and natural conditions). (C)Elsevier Science Inc., 1997.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 266
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
BEAUDOIN A, 1990, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V28, P886, DOI 10.1109/36.58978
[2]   SOIL-MOISTURE ASSESSMENT AT A BASIN-SCALE USING ACTIVE MICROWAVE REMOTE-SENSING - THE AGRISCATT-88 AIRBORNE CAMPAIGN ON THE ORGEVAL WATERSHED [J].
BENALLEGUE, M ;
NORMAND, M ;
GALLE, S ;
DECHAMBRE, M ;
TACONET, O ;
VIDALMADJAR, D ;
PREVOT, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1994, 15 (03) :645-656
[3]  
COPPO P, 1995, P INT GEOSC REM SENS, P1346
[4]  
DUBOIS PC, 1992, INTERNATIONAL SPACE YEAR : SPACE REMOTE SENSING, VOLS 1 AND 2, P1680
[5]   EVALUATING ROUGHNESS MODELS OF RADAR BACKSCATTER [J].
ENGMAN, ET ;
WANG, JR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1987, 25 (06) :709-713
[6]   SIR-C DATA QUALITY AND CALIBRATION RESULTS [J].
FREEMAN, A ;
ALVES, M ;
CHAPMAN, B ;
CRUZ, J ;
KIM, Y ;
SHAFFER, S ;
SUN, J ;
TURNER, E ;
SARABANDI, K .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1995, 33 (04) :848-857
[7]  
Fung A.K., 1994, Microwave Scattering and Emission Models and their Applications
[8]   BACKSCATTERING FROM A RANDOMLY ROUGH DIELECTRIC SURFACE [J].
FUNG, AK ;
LI, ZQ ;
CHEN, KS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1992, 30 (02) :356-369
[9]  
GOVERS GA, 1986, EARTH SURF PROCESS L, V2, P512
[10]   MICROWAVE DIELECTRIC BEHAVIOR OF WET SOIL .1. EMPIRICAL-MODELS AND EXPERIMENTAL-OBSERVATIONS [J].
HALLIKAINEN, MT ;
ULABY, FT ;
DOBSON, MC ;
ELRAYES, MA ;
WU, LK .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1985, 23 (01) :25-34