Phylogenetic relationships of phrynosomatid lizards based on nuclear and mitochondrial data, and a revised phylogeny for Sceloporus

被引:105
作者
Wiens, John J. [1 ]
Kuczynski, Caitlin A. [1 ]
Arif, Saad [1 ]
Reeder, Tod W. [2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Ecol & Evolut, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[2] San Diego State Univ, Dept Biol, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
关键词
Mitochondrial DNA; Nuclear DNA; Phrynosomatidae; Phylogeny; Reptiles; Sceloporus; Species Tree; Squamata; HETEROGENEOUS EVOLUTIONARY PROCESSES; BAYESIAN POSTERIOR PROBABILITIES; DNA-SEQUENCES; SPECIES TREES; SAND LIZARDS; MISSING DATA; IGUANIAN LIZARDS; GENUS SCELOPORUS; DATA SETS; CONFIDENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ympev.2009.09.008
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Phrynosomatid lizards are among the most common and diverse groups of reptiles in western North America, Mexico, and Central America. Phrynosomatidae includes 136 species in 10 genera. Phrynosomatids are used as model systems in many research programs in evolution and ecology, and much of this research has been undertaken in a comparative phylogenetic framework. However, relationships among many phrynosomatid genera are poorly supported and in conflict between recent studies. Further, previous studies based on mitochondrial DNA sequences suggested that the most species-rich genus (Sceloporus) is possibly paraphyletic with respect to as many as four other genera (Petrosaurus, Sator, Urosaurus, and Uta). Here, we collect new sequence data from five nuclear genes and combine them with published data from one additional nuclear gene and five mitochondrial gene regions. We compare trees from nuclear and mitochondrial data from 37 phrynosomatid taxa, including a "species tree" (from BEST) for the nuclear data. We also present a phylogeny for 122 phrynosomatid species based on maximum likelihood analysis of the combined data, which provides a strongly-supported hypothesis for relationships among most phrynosomatid genera and includes most phrynosomatid species. Our results strongly support the monophyly of Sceloporus (including Sator) and many of the relationships within it. We present a new classification for phrynosomatid lizards and the genus Sceloporus, and offer a new tree with branch lengths for use in comparative studies. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 161
页数:12
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence [J].
Alfaro, ME ;
Zoller, S ;
Lutzoni, F .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2003, 20 (02) :255-266
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Inferring phylogenies
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4
[4]  
Benabib M, 1997, EVOLUTION, V51, P1262, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb03973.x
[5]   DIRECTIONAL EVOLUTION OF STOCKINESS COEVOLVES WITH ECOLOGY AND LOCOMOTION IN LIZARDS [J].
Bergmann, Philip J. ;
Meyers, Jay J. ;
Irschick, Duncan J. .
EVOLUTION, 2009, 63 (01) :215-227
[6]   Partitioned Bayesian analyses, partition choice, and the phylogenetic relationships of scincid lizards [J].
Brandley, MC ;
Schmitz, A ;
Reeder, TW .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2005, 54 (03) :373-390
[7]   The importance of data partitioning and the utility of bayes factors in Bayesian phylogenetics [J].
Brown, Jeremy M. ;
Lemmon, Alan R. .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2007, 56 (04) :643-655
[8]   A comparative test of adaptive hypotheses for sexual size dimorphism in lizards [J].
Cox, RM ;
Skelly, SL ;
John-Alder, HB .
EVOLUTION, 2003, 57 (07) :1653-1669
[9]   Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees [J].
Degnan, James H. ;
Rosenberg, Noah A. .
PLOS GENETICS, 2006, 2 (05) :762-768
[10]   PHYLOGENETIC-RELATIONSHIPS AND RATES OF ALLOZYME EVOLUTION AMONG THE LINEAGES OF SCELOPORINE SAND LIZARDS [J].
DEQUEIROZ, K .
BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 1992, 45 (04) :333-362