Determining the benefits of transcranial direct current stimulation on functional upper limb movement in chronic stroke

被引:12
作者
Marquez, Jodie L. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Conley, Alexander C. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Karayanidis, Frini [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Miller, James [1 ]
Lagopoulos, Jim [6 ]
Parsons, Mark W. [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Fac Hlth & Med, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Prior Res Ctr Stroke & Brain Injury, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Newcastle, Sch Psychol, Funct Neuroimaging Lab, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[5] Hunter Med Res Inst, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ Sydney, Brain & Mind Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
chronic stroke; transcranial direct current stimulation; upper limb function; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; MOTOR FUNCTION; CORTICAL STIMULATION; SINGLE-SESSION; DC STIMULATION; CORTEX; TDCS; REHABILITATION; EXCITABILITY; POLARIZATION;
D O I
10.1097/MRR.0000000000000220
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100232 [康复医学];
摘要
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been proposed as a tool to enhance stroke rehabilitation; however, evidence to support its use is lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS on upper limb function in chronic stroke patients. Twenty five participants were allocated to receive 20 min of 1 mA of anodal, cathodal or sham cortical stimulation in a random, counterbalanced order. Patients and assessors were blinded to the intervention at each time point. The primary outcome was upper limb performance as measured by the Jebsen Taylor Test of Hand Function (total score, fine motor subtest score and gross motor subtest score) as well as grip strength. Each outcome was assessed at baseline and at the conclusion of each intervention in both upper limbs. Neither anodal nor cathodal stimulation resulted in statistically significantly improved upper limb performance on any of the measured tasks compared with sham stimulation (P > 0.05). When the data were analysed according to disability, participants with moderate/severe disability showed significantly improved gross motor function following cathodal stimulation compared with sham (P = 0.014). However, this was accompanied by decreased key grip strength in the unaffected hand (P = 0.003). We are unable to endorse the use of anodal and cathodal tDCS in the management of upper limb dysfunction in chronic stroke patients. Although there appears to be more potential for the use of cathodal stimulation in patients with severe disability, the effects were small and must be considered with caution as they were accompanied by unanticipated effects in the unaffected upper limb. Copyright (C) 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 145
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
Adeyemo Bamidele O, 2012, Front Psychiatry, V3, P88, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00088
[2]
Alonso-Alonso Miguel, 2007, Cerebrovasc Dis, V24 Suppl 1, P157, DOI 10.1159/000107392
[3]
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Primary Motor Area Improves Hand Dexterity and Selective Attention in Chronic Stroke [J].
Au-Yeung, Stephanie S. Y. ;
Wang, Juliana ;
Chen, Ye ;
Chua, Eldrich .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2014, 93 (12) :1057-1064
[4]
Arm weight support training improves functional motor outcome and movement smoothness after stroke [J].
Bartolo, Michelangelo ;
De Nunzio, Alessandro Marco ;
Sebastiano, Fabio ;
Spicciato, Francesca ;
Tortola, Paolo ;
Nilsson, Jan ;
Pierelli, Francesco .
FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGY, 2014, 29 (01) :15-21
[5]
Does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhance excitability of the motor cortex and motor function in healthy individuals and subjects with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Bastani, A. ;
Jaberzadeh, S. .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 123 (04) :644-657
[6]
Boggio PS, 2007, RESTOR NEUROL NEUROS, V25, P123
[7]
Using non-invasive brain stimulation to augment motor training-induced plasticity [J].
Bolognini, Nadia ;
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro ;
Fregni, Felipe .
JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2009, 6
[8]
Contralesional Hemisphere Control of the Proximal Paretic Upper Limb following Stroke [J].
Bradnam, Lynley V. ;
Stinear, Cathy M. ;
Barber, P. Alan ;
Byblow, Winston D. .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2012, 22 (11) :2662-2671
[9]
A meta-analysis of the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for upper limb motor recovery in stroke survivors [J].
Butler, Andrew J. ;
Shuster, Margaret ;
O'Hara, Erin ;
Hurley, Kevin ;
Middlebrooks, Dionne ;
Guilkey, Karen .
JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY, 2013, 26 (02) :162-170
[10]
Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of Function in Patients with Stroke [J].
Cha, Hyun-Kyu ;
Ji, Sang-Goo ;
Kim, Myoung-Kwon ;
Chang, Jong-Sung .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2014, 26 (03) :363-365